From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yishai Hadas" <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 01/23] net/mlx5: Add mlx5_trigger_health_work_force()
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 16:43:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-197654@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103163949.1554-2-yishaih@nvidia.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net/mlx5: missing internal error check before mlx5_cmd_fast_teardown_hca()
- [High] net/mlx5: forced health work recovers device when interface is already down
--
commit 2777ddd787832a64204ac170752c47964f6bf998
Author: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
net/mlx5: Add mlx5_trigger_health_work_force()
This commit adds mlx5_trigger_health_work_force() to queue a dedicated work
item that stops the health poller, runs fast HCA teardown, and forces the
device into MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR before running health recovery,
even when the fatal health sensors report no error.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/health.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/health.c
> index aeeb136f5ebc7..d000ac335fa7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/health.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/health.c
> @@ -627,18 +627,11 @@ mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_dump(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, bool forced)
> {
> struct mlx5_fw_reporter_ctx fw_reporter_ctx;
> - struct mlx5_core_health *health;
> - struct mlx5_core_dev *dev;
> - struct devlink *devlink;
> - struct mlx5_priv *priv;
> -
> - health = container_of(work, struct mlx5_core_health, fatal_report_work);
> - priv = container_of(health, struct mlx5_priv, health);
> - dev = container_of(priv, struct mlx5_core_dev, priv);
> - devlink = priv_to_devlink(dev);
> + struct mlx5_core_health *health = &dev->priv.health;
> + struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(dev);
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
> if (test_bit(MLX5_DROP_HEALTH_WORK, &health->flags)) {
> @@ -646,8 +639,26 @@ static void mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err_work(struct work_struct *work)
> mutex_unlock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
> return;
> }
> + /*
> + * The firmware might still be running, so stop it first. Do it under
> + * intf_state_mutex and only while UP, so the cmd interface is valid.
> + */
> + if (forced && test_bit(MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP, &dev->intf_state)) {
> + int err;
> +
> + mlx5_stop_health_poll(dev, false);
> + err = mlx5_cmd_fast_teardown_hca(dev);
> + if (err)
> + mlx5_core_err(dev, "Failed to stop the device before forcing the error state, err %d\n",
> + err);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Should mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err() also verify that dev->state is not
already MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR before calling
mlx5_cmd_fast_teardown_hca(dev), similar to mlx5_try_fast_unload()?
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c:mlx5_try_fast_unload() {
...
if (dev->state == MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR) {
mlx5_core_dbg(dev, "Device in internal error state, giving up\n");
return -EAGAIN;
}
...
}
MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP remains set when poll_health() or
mlx5_enter_error_state() transitions dev->state to
MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR. When dev->state is already
MLX5_DEVICE_STATE_INTERNAL_ERROR, mlx5_cmd_is_down(dev) is true, so
mlx5_cmd_exec_inout() -> cmd_exec() aborts MLX5_CMD_OP_TEARDOWN_HCA with
-ENXIO without sending it to firmware, and mlx5_cmd_check() ->
mlx5_internal_err_ret_value() emulates MLX5_CMD_STAT_OK (0) with a zeroed
output buffer.
In mlx5_cmd_fast_teardown_hca(), this emulated success causes the driver to
write MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_DISABLED to MMIO via
mlx5_set_nic_state() without firmware preparation and busy-wait in a loop
until the teardown timeout expires while holding dev->intf_state_mutex:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fw.c:mlx5_cmd_fast_teardown_hca() {
...
ret = mlx5_cmd_exec_inout(dev, teardown_hca, in, out);
if (ret)
return ret;
state = MLX5_GET(teardown_hca_out, out, state);
if (state == MLX5_TEARDOWN_HCA_OUT_FORCE_STATE_FAIL) {
mlx5_core_warn(dev, "teardown with fast mode failed\n");
return -EIO;
}
mlx5_set_nic_state(dev, MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_DISABLED);
...
}
In addition, because mlx5_health_check_fatal_sensors() checks for
MLX5_INITIAL_SEG_NIC_INTERFACE_DISABLED before sensor_fw_synd_rfr(dev),
overwriting the NIC state register masks MLX5_SENSOR_FW_SYND_RFR and
prevents mlx5_error_sw_reset() -> reset_fw_if_needed() from performing a
firmware SW reset.
> +
> + /*
> + * Enter the error state before unlocking, or an unload could send
> + * TEARDOWN_HCA to the stopped NIC, fail and skip function disable.
> + */
> + enter_error_state(dev, forced);
> mutex_unlock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
[Severity: High]
What happens in mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err() when forced is true, but
MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP is already cleared?
During a non-remove unload such as mlx5_suspend(), mlx5_devlink_reload_down(),
or mlx5_pci_err_detected(), mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked() clears
MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP and calls mlx5_function_teardown(dev, false) ->
mlx5_function_disable(dev, false) -> mlx5_stop_health_poll(dev, false),
which stops the timer without setting MLX5_DROP_HEALTH_WORK:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c:mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked() {
...
clear_bit(MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP, &dev->intf_state);
mlx5_unload(dev);
mlx5_function_teardown(dev, false);
out:
mutex_unlock(&dev->intf_state_mutex);
}
If mlx5_trigger_health_work_force() was queued just before the unload completed,
mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err(dev, true) sees MLX5_DROP_HEALTH_WORK == 0 and
MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP == 0. It skips mlx5_cmd_fast_teardown_hca(), but still
calls enter_error_state(dev, true) and proceeds to devlink_health_report() /
mlx5_health_try_recover(), which will reset and reload a device that was
just suspended or unloaded (or tear down a device that just finished
devlink reload).
Should mlx5_fw_fatal_reporter_err() unlock dev->intf_state_mutex and return
early if !test_bit(MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP, &dev->intf_state) when forced
is true?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103163949.1554-1-yishaih@nvidia.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 16:39 [PATCH rdma-next 00/23] mlx5: Adversarial mode for confidential computing guests Yishai Hadas
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 01/23] net/mlx5: Add mlx5_trigger_health_work_force() Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 02/23] net/mlx5: Derive adversarial mode from CC guest memory encryption Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/23] net/mlx5: Add capability filtering in adversarial mode Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/23] net/mlx5: Add macros for reading log-based caps Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/23] RDMA/mlx5: Reject QP transport types not enabled by FW capability Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/23] RDMA/mlx5: Require IB_QPT_DRIVER for the DC vendor QP types Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/23] RDMA/mlx5: Derive mlx5_ib_adversarial_mode global from mlx5_core adversarial API Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/23] RDMA/core: Suppress kverbs_provider for adversarial_mode devices Yishai Hadas
2026-11-03 19:03 ` Jacob Moroni
2026-11-03 19:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/23] RDMA/mlx5: Remove duplicate mlx5_ib_umr_context struct Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/23] RDMA/mlx5: Introduce per-CQ poll_one hook in mlx5_ib_cq Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 11/23] RDMA/mlx5: Add shadow FIFO infrastructure for UMR completions Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 12/23] RDMA/mlx5: Verify UMR CQ polling against a hostile NIC Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 13/23] RDMA/mlx5: Keep the UMR QP failed once a forged CQE is detected Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 14/23] RDMA/mlx5: Block generic CQ poll path in adversarial mode Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 15/23] RDMA/core: Set the CQ comp_handler after its poll context is set up Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 16/23] RDMA/mlx5: Ignore completion events for a CQ without a handler Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 17/23] RDMA/mlx5: Validate EQE port and GSI port before indexing devr.ports[] Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 18/23] RDMA/mlx5: Validate firmware RQ/SQ state before sqrq_trans[] lookup Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 19/23] RDMA/mlx5: Clamp log_max_cq_sz shift in CQ size checks Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 20/23] RDMA/mlx5: Clamp log_max_* shifts in QP and WQ limit checks Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 21/23] RDMA/mlx5: Clamp log_max_* shifts in query_device and ucontext paths Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 22/23] RDMA/core: Report and enforce adversarial mode via GET_CONTEXT Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 16:39 ` [PATCH rdma-next 23/23] RDMA/mlx5: Advertise adversarial mode via ib_device::adversarial_mode Yishai Hadas
2026-11-04 16:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-197654@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox