From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793812429; b=UJOWw08i0tWPWFvwSSxp+gjkYznl6yvpmtuQWmM3b/0Xmvq1l8ri5Jy7TfQM0/6OpeWr WZd2RzMZZ7k3hmy0cNnNZBDSxDkasFWqmkU0sEpT0ugFM/38+3RhbTXgd4F0r8pxCxrxl 6ala5BFpZmh/svql0/hpsw1tVH3CUF8UH7yX0hHsNB4j9J8A2Kt1FwLNo7TA9BRxMqx6M 3diDZ3Ps/6ouWA/inSIGLq5CC7WOBbqZQHW5vz48d8UzKacJUjkovZ64Ka5c9BoJkety9 infD0nZkMnEyJDwvH1oktXPOeYhAhh02Pa3Bkh4w/DdCw8mVrNdPH9JoyJ+M6c+tzIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793812429; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=uQxxJ4cQvAZJyc6lZsbEcTAblLxQDmIFmAjuXuDUuQw=; b=DzGsdwSSFGkF+lZldLOx/h2ljIs3yuq0OlbT1d/RkZzoi9BE/oX8AmO7uGBmAqDMC1Bq TINyzpQh5u7dInreW0gNaF5h0r3rRuTv8fi05q0xp4W/wvNI5N+6aX+Mnvrne8FMX9gg5 dhti1mfIpREDnmfW4iuaPjdcDx+k+zXu0qx0Hywdv2Hzvkb2lwOSVjQ+M9X/oqfbjOn4B CAw05ayU1LfiMCxIA69kT4ViQmoeozq5rcFQJbGy1BfiO0tj1p7I37yIUQHu499gUKkth HRs/Kj4UK1C8JGmdwR7VsK+KxxjjF9fKvFiY8cAXZr3i8zcz7Ai3fZkfaTKyl8Go89Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=nXEmmV7G; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7C3606D807 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=nXEmmV7G Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 028931F00A16; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793812429; bh=uQxxJ4cQvAZJyc6lZsbEcTAblLxQDmIFmAjuXuDUuQw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=nXEmmV7GJStLLlMRvtWkMnjiBJDPaV1QqSifDhcDBnSf9ymrlAWHxJhi5LZlhaBmE bc+rjQLqzSiPn5edMwpCqwBcdsf2FbhDyh3VAq2FbX74OR3bKzhFusDhHOOlJfpnaq ypVFu1KVNfbh85xfZrPF8yMjnN8zAcLkaM7Vhhl8Ih3V6v6t0AwOgFfLhFJS6R3iMB gOWP65VLj+Rq1tiH7jZvf3C7NwnfKyKfDzQvKe7VIw1HO6Zj/tTaHtP9dz8Mwddld4 aga4N/qRext+OI2wrvbTosUTloZexpPbseg17Pfjs7+lYD+e/I0gxXhGHkHUIjoQK6 64r4usWYPheMA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/15] net/mlx5: LAG, drop MLX5_MAX_PORTS scratch array from device rescan Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Tariq Toukan" Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261103171009.563034-10-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261103171009.563034-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20261103171009.563034-10-tariqt@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 17:13:48 +0000 X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > From: Shay Drory >=20 > mlx5_lag_rescan_devices_locked_filter() collected the participating LAG > members into a fixed-size devs[MLX5_MAX_PORTS] array only to iterate > over it a second time for the rescan calls. Drop the scratch array and > re-walk the members directly with mlx5_lag_for_each(). >=20 > This removes another dependency on the compile-time MLX5_MAX_PORTS bound > with no functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shay Drory > Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh > Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103171009.5630= 34-1-tariqt@nvidia.com?part=3D9