From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793812432; b=XZctSKzYXC/A0dOUo+x5Yf2XwBcqOvxvt2VPQU9YSG2k3f/4C7qB7y10fv3YoBx39GMY 9uEFAHqzfrTdCucqjMsw4HgQSuooyh8XkSjLbSG+bbRzV4XKx2U8B6hWDjHFyFWaUwFRM rQwsC9GcPIXv6gRH50IBZRxfkAPm5UmzHpV4MhtfO+Sze1GDCOqmcEW6YRUy40HV8tThr pMVE6Mnk7lVyKX2dj6giRmZCdCYEUTDX/QkL39kufgyQWGkkDzlXFdblpX6plI7Ag2Orj K5A6ANR6n5HDfHc1QFyCYAle7A0S0ZWyHGut4pN5mx7ZLegFX5Yvkhp76wO2yRt+Srw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793812432; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=k8AOw2s7iNaNuSft5Peqi7cGAeI5/eN7pqDNUSyb1MA=; b=KdT32k3clDNXTCOn7loBrZk6QPK777Y131aJ2XOCb5bDMFQxpOoYqIyo74u6dSvtBJj+ a/x1x0vGKEoAUoBLnT0jUa6WGLrhuMzNMeP3mwj9wEnRNGc3CKYqc3xMGt+56YHB4u30D aAM7/5p/whoQVUb1G5wF8nS2ZgjCAFy2okbsUAmJOlTsM2CTGLm4YezA1hi7EtGGKxKij Gbut/OCUwZ3rblJRDvqeSFDHwU/imKrqttv+ZtypgxMrYjO5a7CpJCggWNCdXxR2iuaQv 1Xvik2nYjhwPpSoYZSbZ4IkXmjmGdgFzfhHuLtFzq0i2OsGn/9AGaicqqrLESD+RQUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=QXLWs5xN; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22ED606D803 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=QXLWs5xN Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D0941F00A16; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 17:13:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793812431; bh=k8AOw2s7iNaNuSft5Peqi7cGAeI5/eN7pqDNUSyb1MA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=QXLWs5xNcDCEabSf+ZNfyO2xe3mT7hE5DdBtQeNbSsUgaolR7WSchTtXSO6Syn50b G82t6eRQqUkvXh50bRfYIRdAn7oRGVkSsyY7cANmruZIvUaAJxKxj8T0NS2ZEGwrQO O16h9+25mgFYvg++wmhhAR7/GHYcA2LSy8v7fwhE8G7R5IL3z6D22AzCfhv+RGEPV1 d/M2szhU0QqlApyAKOfVt+0jEgJ/GL8mJRmCfT5O1Q79OfWJRMLRVSNCNbYIgoqIHJ +OdRxZzM0I5U5n5W5vnEsGySs5f0xZV0mXsaIWFiY0gM7/vH7XIFoGwDp3rZXgcKHD GSIA4HIsikgfA== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/15] net/mlx5: E-switch, drop master egress rule under a SW vport LAG Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Tariq Toukan" Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261103171009.563034-14-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261103171009.563034-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20261103171009.563034-14-tariqt@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 17:13:51 +0000 X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list > From: Shay Drory >=20 > VPORT_LAG steers all traffic of a LAG slave to the LAG master. The > eswitch master egress rule does the opposite direction: it bounces > traffic that reached the master's manager vport into the slave eswitch. > With a FW vport LAG the FW steers that bounced packet to the LAG master, > so the two coexist. >=20 > The software vport LAG emulation cannot. It is a catch-all rule in the > slave eswitch's egress ACL that forwards to the master's manager vport, > while the master egress rule redirects the packet after the FDB - past > the point where the slave egress rule is evaluated - so the bounced > packet never reaches it. >=20 > The two therefore cannot coexist: drop the master egress rule when the > [ ... ] >=20 > Signed-off-by: Shay Drory > Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch > Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103171009.5630= 34-1-tariqt@nvidia.com?part=3D13