From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aibing Chen" <chenaibing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/cma: add rdma_destroy_id_wq() and use it from RDS
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 15:05:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-215605@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114150541.1908-1-chenaibing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] RDMA/cma: deadlock on ordered cma_wq in destroy_id_work()
- [Medium] net/rds: UAF on rds_rdma unload with pending
rdma_destroy_id_wq()
- [Medium] RDMA/cma: cma_cleanup() tears down cma_pernet before draining
cma_wq
- [Low] RDMA/cma: missing Fixes trailer on RDS lockdep bug fix
- [Low] RDMA/cma: missing documentation for exported
rdma_destroy_id_wq() API
--
commit 8d1d784abda4c543f5197cf89fc2119bf91e1d62
Author: Aibing Chen <chenaibing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> RDMA/cma: add rdma_destroy_id_wq() and use it from RDS
>
> syzbot reported a possible circular locking dependency between
> rds_trans_sem and the RDMA CM handler mutex:
>
> CPU0 (bind path) CPU1 (CM callback path)
> ---- ----
> down_read(&rds_trans_sem) mutex_lock(&handler_mutex)
> rds_ib_laddr_check() cma_ib_req_handler()
> rdma_destroy_id() rds_ib_cm_handle_connect()
> mutex_lock(&handler_mutex) rds_conn_create()
> rds_trans_get_preferred()
> down_read(&rds_trans_sem)
>
> rds_ib_laddr_check_cm() destroys the CM id from inside
> rds_trans_get_preferred()'s read-side critical section, while CM
> callbacks create RDS connections (taking the same read lock) from
> under handler_mutex.
>
> Break the cycle by destroying the CM id asynchronously: add
> rdma_destroy_id_wq(), which queues the destruction on cma_wq, and
> switch rds_ib_laddr_check_cm() to it. The destroy work is embedded
> in struct rdma_id_private, which keeps the id alive until the work
> runs; rds does not touch cm_id after the destroy call.
>
> This formalizes the approach proposed and syzbot-tested by Hillf
> Danton; Eduard Zateev additionally verified the fix on a real QEMU
> system (KASAN + lockdep + RDMA_RXE, active and passive RDS
> connections established without any lockdep output).
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+ccdb5058c3df2d94811c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ccdb5058c3df2d94811c
> Suggested-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
> Tested-by: syzbot+ccdb5058c3df2d94811c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: Eduard Zateev <hackerowskiy@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aibing Chen <chenaibing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
[Severity: Low]
Since this fixes a lockdep cycle in the RDS/IB transport, should it
include:
Fixes: ec16227e1414 ("RDS/IB: Infiniband transport")
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> index 337a49d1acf72..d10aaf51ee86b 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
> @@ -2126,6 +2126,25 @@ void rdma_destroy_id(struct rdma_cm_id *id)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_destroy_id);
>
> +static void destroy_id_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct rdma_id_private *id_priv =
> + container_of(work, struct rdma_id_private, destroy_work);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
> + destroy_id_handler_unlock(id_priv);
> +}
> +
> +void rdma_destroy_id_wq(struct rdma_cm_id *id)
> +{
> + struct rdma_id_private *id_priv =
> + container_of(id, struct rdma_id_private, id);
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&id_priv->destroy_work, destroy_id_work);
> + queue_work(cma_wq, &id_priv->destroy_work);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_destroy_id_wq);
[Severity: High]
Can destroy_id_work() deadlock the ordered cma_wq workqueue when another
event queues work for the same id_priv behind destroy_work?
cma_init() creates cma_wq with alloc_ordered_workqueue(), so only one work
item runs at a time in FIFO order. After rdma_bind_addr() attaches id_priv
to cma_dev->id_list, rdma_destroy_id_wq() queues destroy_work without
removing id_priv from cma_dev->id_list or marking it RDMA_CM_DESTROYING:
CPU0 CPU1 cma_wq
rds_ib_laddr_check_cm()
rdma_bind_addr(cm_id, ...)
rdma_destroy_id_wq(cm_id)
queue_work(cma_wq,
&destroy_work)
cma_netdev_change()
cma_id_get(id_priv)
queue_work(cma_wq,
&work->work)
destroy_id_work()
...
_destroy_id()
cma_id_put()
wait_for_completion()
<-- hangs forever
Because cma_work_handler() is queued behind destroy_id_work() on the same
ordered workqueue, it can never run to call cma_id_put(id_priv) and
complete id_priv->comp, wedging cma_wq system-wide.
[Severity: Medium]
Can queuing _destroy_id() on cma_wq race with cma_cleanup() during module
unload and access freed cma_pernet memory?
In cma_cleanup(), unregister_pernet_subsys(&cma_pernet_operations) runs
before destroy_workqueue(cma_wq):
drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:cma_cleanup() {
...
ib_unregister_client(&cma_client);
unregister_pernet_subsys(&cma_pernet_operations);
destroy_workqueue(cma_wq);
...
}
If rdma_bind_addr() bound a wildcard address (leaving id_priv->cma_dev NULL
while allocating a bind_list entry in pernet->tcp_ps), or if _destroy_id()
finishes cma_release_dev(id_priv) just before cma_release_port(id_priv),
ib_unregister_client() will not wait for destroy_id_work() to finish.
cma_exit_net() can then hit WARN_ON(!xa_empty(&pernet->tcp_ps)) and free
the pernet structure before destroy_id_work() calls cma_release_port() ->
cma_ps_remove(), causing a use-after-free.
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/rdma/rdma_cm.h b/include/rdma/rdma_cm.h
> index d639ff889e649..ac1c1d9177e2e 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/rdma_cm.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/rdma_cm.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct rdma_cm_id *rdma_create_user_id(rdma_cm_event_handler event_handler,
> * asynchronous operations associated with the id.
> */
> void rdma_destroy_id(struct rdma_cm_id *id);
> +void rdma_destroy_id_wq(struct rdma_cm_id *id);
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but rdma_destroy_id_wq() is a newly exported API placed
right under the kernel-doc comment for rdma_destroy_id() without
documentation of its own. Unlike rdma_destroy_id(), it returns before
in-flight callbacks and operations associated with the id are canceled or
drained, so documenting its asynchronous lifetime and callback constraints
would help callers use it safely.
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib.c b/net/rds/ib.c
> index 4ea9838d090c3..1290747cdd991 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib.c
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int rds_ib_laddr_check_cm(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr,
> cm_id->device ? cm_id->device->node_type : -1);
>
> out:
> - rdma_destroy_id(cm_id);
> + rdma_destroy_id_wq(cm_id);
>
> return ret;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Can unloading rds_rdma while destroy_id_work() is still pending on cma_wq
cause a use-after-free in rds_rdma's code and rodata?
rds_ib_laddr_check_cm() creates cm_id with event_handler set to
rds_rdma_cm_event_handler and restrack kern_name set to KBUILD_MODNAME.
Previously, rdma_destroy_id() waited for cm_id teardown inside
rds_trans_get_preferred() under rds_trans_sem, which serialized against
rds_trans_unregister() in rds_ib_exit().
With rdma_destroy_id_wq(), rds_ib_laddr_check_cm() returns while cm_id is
still attached to cma_dev->id_list and restrack, and rds_ib_exit() does not
drain cma_wq:
CPU0 CPU1
rds_trans_get_preferred()
rds_ib_laddr_check_cm()
rdma_create_id(...,
rds_rdma_cm_event_handler, ...)
rdma_bind_addr(cm_id, sa)
rdma_destroy_id_wq(cm_id)
up_read(&rds_trans_sem)
rds_ib_exit()
...
rds_trans_unregister()
/* rds_rdma module freed */
cma_send_device_removal_put()
id_priv->id.event_handler() <-- calls freed module .text
A concurrent netlink RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_RES_CM_ID_GET dump in
fill_res_name_pid() can likewise read res->kern_name from freed module
rodata before destroy_id_work() runs.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114150541.1908-1-chenaibing@cmss.chinamobile.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 15:05 [PATCH] RDMA/cma: add rdma_destroy_id_wq() and use it from RDS Aibing Chen
2026-11-15 0:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-15 15:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-215605@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chenaibing@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox