From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Cc: nab@linux-iscsi.org, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, oren@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:54:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1fvjn9rqs.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401639581-20111-3-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> (Sagi Grimberg's message of "Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:19:41 +0300")
>>>>> "Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> writes:
Sagi,
Sagi> In various areas of the code, it is assumed that
Sagi> se_cmd-> data_length describes pure data. In case
Sagi> that protection information exists over the wire (protect bits is
Sagi> are on) the target core decrease the protection length from the
Sagi> data length (instead of each transport peeking in the cdb).
I completely agree with the notion of including PI in the transport byte
count.
Why do you open code the transfer length adjustment below?
+ /**
+ * Adjust data_length to include
+ * protection information
+ **/
+ switch (sc->device->sector_size) {
+ case 512:
+ data_len += (data_len >> 9) * 8;
+ break;
+ case 1024:
+ data_len += (data_len >> 10) * 8;
+ break;
+ case 2048:
+ data_len += (data_len >> 11) * 8;
+ break;
+ case 4096:
+ data_len += (data_len >> 12) * 8;
+ break;
+ default:
+ data_len +=
+ (data_len >> ilog2(sc->device->sector_size)) * 8;
+ }
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-02 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-01 16:19 [PATCH 0/2] Include protection information in iscsi header Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-01 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] libiscsi, iser: Adjust data_length to include protection information Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <1401639581-20111-2-git-send-email-sagig-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-03 16:06 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <538DF27F.50903-hcNo3dDEHLuVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-03 22:18 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <yq1wqcx3act.fsf-+q57XtR/GgMb6DWv4sQWN6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-05 17:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-03 16:11 ` Mike Christie
2014-06-05 17:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-01 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] TARGET/sbc,loopback: Adjust command data length in case pi exists on the wire Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-02 16:54 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2014-06-05 17:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
2014-06-03 6:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] Include protection information in iscsi header Roland Dreier
2014-06-03 7:56 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-06-05 17:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1fvjn9rqs.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=oren@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox