From: Philipp Rossak <embed3d@gmail.com>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, julien.massot@iot.bzh
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] Restructure the rpmsg_char driver and introduce rpmsg_ctrl driver
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:45:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15be2f08-ba03-2b80-6f53-2056359d5c41@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <670ee336-9ad4-401e-e3b2-02531e975e51@foss.st.com>
Hi Arnaud,
On 24.02.22 09:29, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> On 2/23/22 22:28, Philipp Rossak wrote:
>> Hi Arnaud,
>>
>> thanks for working on this! I'm currently testing/using this patch
>> series on my imx7d project because it adds the capability that the
>> remote processor can register it's endpoints dynamically (as mentioned
>> in the objectives).
>
> Thanks for your feedback on this work!
> Don't hesitate to add your tested-by, this help maintainers for the reviews.
>
I will do this.
>>
>> After a few tests, debugging, and checking the openamp specification [1]
>> I think that you missed the second ns_announcement that should be sent
>> from linux master to the slave after it created the channel/endpoint.
>> Without this second announcement the remote processor is not able to
>> send messages to the linux master because it doesn't know the
>> destination address until it receives a message from the linux master.
>
> Yes I detected this issues, it is not related to the series
> but to the remoteproc_virtio backend.
>
> As you mentioned, after the ns announcement from Linux, the remote processor
> send first messages. But the Linux virtio does not do the match between the
> local channel created and the remote endpoint.
>
I'm not sure if we talk about the same. I'm basically talking about the
dynamic binding, not dynamic endpoint creation.
I think I already found the issue. I will try to get a bit more into detail.
1. Linux: starts co-processor via remoteproc
2. co-processor: boots and reaches the point where it creates the
endpoint like it is done in this ST example[1].
Be aware the src address is RPMSG_ADDR_ANY
3. co-processor: reaches the point where it sends the ns_announcement to
linux ns endpoint
4. linux: receives the ns announcment, creates the channel, bindes the
endpoint and checks here [2] if the source address is not RPMSG_ADDR_ANY
and in this case it is not sending a ns_announcement (that's the issue
when we use dynamic endpoints)
5. linux: according the openamp spec [3] it should now send the
ns_announcement to the co-processor (slave)
6. co-processor: should receive the ns announcement and binds now the
endpoint
7. co-processor: can now send messages to linux
This is basically what I'm expecting.
Do you think this is a bug or is the dynamic endpoint binding not
handled? This line is there since ever [4] ...
Any other thoughts about this?
> This is a feature that is missing in the rpmsg virtio, and perhaps in rpmsg protocol
> itself (a ns annoucement ack message or something similar).
>
>
> A fix for the remoteproc virtio is available here:
> https://github.com/arnopo/meta-st-stm32mp-oss/commit/3e57fe73bd19c9bb835ac5a118e50727758b0b96
>
> Don't hesitate to give me feedback on the fix, if you test it.
I added it to my branch and till now I don't see any side effects
>
> I plan to propose the fix after this series.
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Philipp
>>
Cheers,
Philipp
[1]:
https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeMP1/blob/master/Projects/STM32MP157C-DK2/Applications/OpenAMP/OpenAMP_raw/Src/openamp.c#L242
[2]:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17-rc5/source/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c#L425
[3]:
https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp/blob/main/docs/img/coprocessor-rpmsg-ns.png
[4]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bcabbccabffe7326f046f25737ba1084f463c65c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-25 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 10:25 [PATCH v9 00/11] Restructure the rpmsg_char driver and introduce rpmsg_ctrl driver Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] rpmsg: char: Export eptdev create and destroy functions Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] rpmsg: Create the rpmsg class in core instead of in rpmsg char Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] rpmsg: Move the rpmsg control device from rpmsg_char to rpmsg_ctrl Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] arm: configs: Configs that had RPMSG_CHAR now get RPMSG_CTRL Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] RISC-V: " Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: defconfig: Config that had RPMSG_CHAR now gets RPMSG_CTRL Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] rpmsg: Update rpmsg_chrdev_register_device function Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] rpmsg: char: Refactor rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_create function Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] rpmsg: char: Add possibility to use default endpoint of the rpmsg device Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] rpmsg: char: Introduce the "rpmsg-raw" channel Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-01-24 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] rpmsg: ctrl: Introduce new RPMSG_CREATE/RELEASE_DEV_IOCTL controls Arnaud Pouliquen
2022-02-23 21:28 ` [PATCH v9 00/11] Restructure the rpmsg_char driver and introduce rpmsg_ctrl driver Philipp Rossak
2022-02-24 8:29 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-02-25 21:45 ` Philipp Rossak [this message]
2022-02-28 9:02 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-03-24 17:36 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-03-25 15:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-03-25 17:05 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2022-03-25 17:27 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-03-25 17:52 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15be2f08-ba03-2b80-6f53-2056359d5c41@gmail.com \
--to=embed3d@gmail.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=julien.massot@iot.bzh \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox