From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>, <andersson@kernel.org>,
<mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
<alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] remoteproc: stm32: Clean up redundant dev_err_probe()
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15e381f6-aabd-8a3a-7911-4e64828b0fdc@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230802095128.995428-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
Hi,
On 8/2/23 11:51, Chen Jiahao wrote:
> Referring to platform_get_irq()'s definition, the return value has
> already been checked if ret < 0, and printed via dev_err_probe().
> Calling dev_err_probe() one more time outside platform_get_irq()
> is obviously redundant.
>
> Removing dev_err_probe() outside platform_get_irq() to clean up
> above problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jiahao <chenjiahao16@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 98234b44f038..a09eeb83ea5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, irq, "failed to get interrupt\n");
> + return irq;
The IRQ is optional so using platform_get_irq_optional seems a better option to me.
- irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, irq, "failed to get interrupt\n");
Thanks,
Arnaud
>
> if (irq > 0) {
> err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, stm32_rproc_wdg, 0,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 9:51 [PATCH -next] remoteproc: stm32: Clean up redundant dev_err_probe() Chen Jiahao
2023-08-16 12:46 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2023-08-17 2:33 ` chenjiahao (C)
2023-08-17 7:02 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2023-08-17 8:20 ` chenjiahao (C)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15e381f6-aabd-8a3a-7911-4e64828b0fdc@foss.st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=chenjiahao16@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox