From: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
To: <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>,
<bill.mills@linaro.com>, <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] remoteproc: Enable getter for drivers that manage 2+ remotes
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 07:37:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221115153753.2065803-1-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> (raw)
This RFC is to show the following
(a) a use case for a new remoteproc API rproc_get_by_id()
(b) patch for the new API rproc_get_by_id()
For context there exist multiple drivers in remoteproc that manage more than
one remote processor. For these drivers, calls to rproc_get_by_phandle()
are not sufficient as the check at
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c#L2111
will not work. This is because for r->dev.parent, r->dev's parent is
expected to be the platform device that corresponds to the platform-probe()
call but instead is the child and this child does not have the driver field
set.
An example to show this issue is as follows:
If a remoteproc driver has the following DTS binding:
/{
remoteproc_cluster {
compatible = "soc,remoteproc-cluster";
core0: core0 {
memory-region;
sram;
};
core1: core1 {
memory-region;
sram;
}
};
};
And in the corresponding driver the platform-probe() is as follows:
static int cluster_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct platform_device *cpdev;
struct device *child_dev;
struct rproc *rp;
for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
cpdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
child_dev = &cpdev->dev;
rp = rproc_alloc(cdev, dev_name(cdev), dummy_ops, NULL,
sizeof(struct dummy_ops));
}
return 0;
}
After the rproc call is done and when another driver tries to access this
rproc structure via a rproc_get_by_phandle(), the aforementioned check of
r->dev.parent->driver will be NULL.
To account for a remoteproc driver that manages multiple remote processors,
I have provided an API rproc_get_by_id() that enables getting rp
given a phandle to the core in question with a DT binding and usage of the API.
Sample binding:
/{
platform_driver_sample {
compatible = "custom_platform";
rproc = <&core1>;
};
};
Sample usage:
static int custom_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct rproc *rp;
struct device_node *node;
node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "rproc", 0);
/* Here get rproc 1, as its index should be 1 */
rp = rproc_get_by_id(node->phandle, 1);
return 0;
}
If we want further specification of getting the correct remoteproc ID,
this can be inferred from the pdev->dev child's device child node and
its dev->init_name field as this is set in rproc_alloc() as follows:
dev_set_name(&rproc->dev, "remoteproc%d", rproc->index);
We can then parse the pdev->dev child device as follows:
int index;
sscanf(dev_name(dev), "remoteproc%d", &index);
Additionally I have provided the implementation for the API in
the subsequent patch.
Ben Levinsky (1):
remoteproc: Introduce rproc_get_by_id API
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 15:37 Ben Levinsky [this message]
2022-11-15 15:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_get_by_id API Ben Levinsky
2022-11-25 18:05 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-11-30 21:39 ` Levinsky, Ben
2022-12-02 17:00 ` Mathieu Poirier
[not found] ` <ba21b0e5-80e2-d976-1bf3-98a91825086b@amd.com>
2022-12-08 19:05 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-12-09 19:01 ` Ben Levinsky
2022-12-13 21:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-12-13 22:21 ` Mathieu Poirier
[not found] ` <D93BFC0C-F90C-413E-899F-9CF5C6FB794A@amd.com>
2022-12-14 17:17 ` Ben Levinsky
2022-12-14 20:17 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221115153753.2065803-1-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com \
--to=ben.levinsky@xilinx.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=bill.mills@linaro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox