Linux Remote Processor Subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Chunkai Deng <chunkai.deng@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chris.lew@oss.qualcomm.com,
	tony.truong@oss.qualcomm.com, tao.zhang1@oss.qualcomm.com,
	peter.chen@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Request the RX interrupt already enabled
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 12:54:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a4287e0-639d-4bef-bbfc-a6e192084b59@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824-rpmsg-glink-split-protocol-start-v2-2-362d7c233f66@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 8/24/26 9:05 AM, Chunkai Deng wrote:
> The receive interrupt is requested masked early in probe and enabled
> further down, once the glink instance has been stored in the transport.
> Now that the version command is no longer sent from
> qcom_glink_native_probe(), nothing needs to happen between those two
> points.
> 
> Request the interrupt where it used to be enabled, and drop
> IRQF_NO_AUTOEN along with the enable_irq() call. The RPM error path
> becomes a set of labels, the way SMEM already unwinds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chunkai Deng <chunkai.deng@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
> ---

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

Konrad

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24  7:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] rpmsg: glink: Fix version handshake race against a late RX interrupt Chunkai Deng
2026-08-24  7:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rpmsg: glink: Split protocol start out of native_probe Chunkai Deng
2026-09-03 10:49   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-08-24  7:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Request the RX interrupt already enabled Chunkai Deng
2026-09-03 10:54   ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a4287e0-639d-4bef-bbfc-a6e192084b59@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=chris.lew@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=chunkai.deng@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.chen@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=tao.zhang1@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=tony.truong@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox