From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C2D2C190; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 07:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720424044; cv=none; b=OZ5WZS8Pn4Bi69Tnor9oZ2GNcjVgKKZWXgGI3gk9m1q6tnK9h5KHmZYGs1iJjvOW6jXU1JCFpT7TheDRdiUIf1CvBG3t/CZuENucQkkr4F3C/LigdA29qqEZb9pq6wpGIWbCqIAw0noC/3qSQi3LD9HXZZ9jcIwht86jnPIePSc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720424044; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k+uHL+r1KGld/bCaf75K3N0eVgNccAN9YKGlrDKxtXA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Y4LImH0qmHWIwNCCJQuw1SIc1g8a7bhhKuopdPHqvNIrrZqYrVu2shqSHBwU2IAgQP9XmIRdaarsHY29AOgXn5N8sjRj+BQAqx+EBI6H15xqpNOYzBkQvc5PLTUWNeLNg4qUbLsDekfFNDoNMsZzXVe7ljxsCnxDGkDEA3JkjAM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=TQO53XEU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="TQO53XEU" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7413820004; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 07:33:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1720424040; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0pDbjWiqzlXoJwRK62KRTo8CbYzwvXFWm5jiu7miVts=; b=TQO53XEUkY9Y+4rv5ptpdY8K0txhr3258zN1DC/He7S/rffKeT3tAfbWcXmVy9GPXYvXbw mjieZonYhWNR5RUxQPTMhyT14O3LrqvCN/WulRO+2lr/8LeAkkMWxmoij9lqT9hdCgJnZg BHgB0CNW1aVk7vMs3QT/Toi4GQPdWOZVcDErr0o6D3p9OzX1ys9rLMpeUG13Qoc0H+1z55 FYg9yq/msJW7OceVb2w/tW2bSiGeSuqR38I1nDZj2BwlJ/7ZCrekI9UjAhuumKC9+tICSH +HaGVXEQxKfxxk72lmKnxjCVsy7DPYcVSTrFrX+BlB8Pim5GzQm2t0KQp263bQ== Message-ID: <3a208581-2fd4-4522-8cb5-c61fd52990c1@bootlin.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:33:58 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce suspend to ram support To: Hari Nagalla , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier Cc: Philipp Zabel , Suman Anna , Thomas Petazzoni , Alexandre Belloni , Udit Kumar , Thomas Richard , Gregory CLEMENT , =?UTF-8?Q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240621150058.319524-1-richard.genoud@bootlin.com> <9036f912-bc84-9179-5eb5-270fee6f8cb9@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US, fr From: Richard GENOUD Organization: Bootlin In-Reply-To: <9036f912-bc84-9179-5eb5-270fee6f8cb9@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: richard.genoud@bootlin.com Le 01/07/2024 à 11:59, Hari Nagalla a écrit : > On 6/21/24 10:00, Richard Genoud wrote: >> Richard Genoud (4): >>    remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection >>    remoteproc: k3-r5: Introduce PM suspend/resume handlers >>    remoteproc: k3-r5: k3_r5_rproc_stop: code reorder >>    remoteproc: k3-r5: support for graceful stop of remote cores > IMO, the patches are better reordered as below (since there is a LPM > rearch in progress) > patch1 - Independent of other patches and is clearly a bug fix. > patch3,4 - Support for graceful shutdown. A separate feature used by > customers wanting to change FW at runtime and is independent of > suspend/resume. > patch 2 - suspend/resume handlers.. > Indeed, patches 2, 3, 4 still need some internal discussions. But I think patch 1 could be taken as is, since it's a bug fix. Regards, Richard