From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:16:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498403f4-98ff-40ec-adfc-c0ffba6450aa@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dfb3c96e-0684-4e61-b1c9-5a83f61e0418@kernel.org>
On 5/21/24 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/05/2024 10:09, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> The "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" compatible is utilized in a system configuration
>> where the Cortex-M4 firmware is loaded by the Trusted execution Environment
>> (TEE).
>> For instance, this compatible is used in both the Linux and OP-TEE
>> device-tree:
>> - In OP-TEE, a node is defined in the device tree with the
>> st,stm32mp1-m4-tee to support signed remoteproc firmware.
>> Based on DT properties, OP-TEE authenticates, loads, starts, and stops
>> the firmware.
>> - On Linux, when the compatibility is set, the Cortex-M resets should not
>> be declared in the device tree.
>>
>
> Not tested.
>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
> don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
> about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
>
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
> the process allowing the patch to be tested.
>
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
I apologize for this oversight; I will resend the pull request and adding
the missing CC and To.
Thanks!
Arnaud
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 8:09 [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-21 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-21 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for " Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-21 9:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-05-21 12:16 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2024-05-28 20:08 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-05-21 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add processor identifier property Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-21 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] remoteproc: core introduce rproc_set_rsc_table_on_start function Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-28 21:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-05-21 8:09 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] remoteproc: core: support of the tee interface Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-28 21:30 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-05-29 7:13 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-05-29 20:35 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-05-30 7:42 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-05-30 16:14 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-05-31 17:28 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-06-03 8:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-06-03 14:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-05-21 8:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-05-21 8:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498403f4-98ff-40ec-adfc-c0ffba6450aa@foss.st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox