From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:28:26 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Leger Message-ID: <79048597.12371594.1579098506802.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> In-Reply-To: <088ceab9-f135-6e70-dcf6-f75ec46110b1@st.com> References: <20200115102142.11229-1-cleger@kalray.eu> <088ceab9-f135-6e70-dcf6-f75ec46110b1@st.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Add support for predefined notifyids MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , linux-remoteproc , linux-kernel List-ID: Hi Arnaud, ----- On 15 Jan, 2020, at 15:06, Arnaud Pouliquen arnaud.pouliquen@st.com w= rote: > Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, >=20 > On 1/15/20 11:21 AM, Clement Leger wrote: >> In order to support preallocated notify ids, if their value is >> equal to FW_RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY, then do no allocate a notify id >> dynamically but try to allocate the requested one. This is useful when >> using custom ids to bind them to custom vendor resources. For instance, >> it allow to assign a group of queues to a specific interrupti in order >> to dispatch notifications. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- >> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> index 307df98347ba..b1485fcd0f11 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c >> @@ -351,14 +351,27 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, in= t i) >> =09/* >> =09 * Assign an rproc-wide unique index for this vring >> =09 * TODO: assign a notifyid for rvdev updates as well >> -=09 * TODO: support predefined notifyids (via resource table) >> =09 */ >> -=09ret =3D idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); >> -=09if (ret < 0) { >> -=09=09dev_err(dev, "idr_alloc failed: %d\n", ret); >> -=09=09return ret; >> +=09if (rsc->vring[i].notifyid =3D=3D FW_RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY) { >> +=09=09ret =3D idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); >> +=09=09if (ret < 0) { >> +=09=09=09dev_err(dev, "idr_alloc failed: %d\n", ret); >> +=09=09=09return ret; >> +=09=09} >> +=09=09notifyid =3D ret; >> + >> +=09=09/* Let the rproc know the notifyid of this vring.*/ >> +=09=09rsc->vring[i].notifyid =3D notifyid; >> +=09} else { >> +=09=09/* Reserve requested notify_id */ >> +=09=09notifyid =3D rsc->vring[i].notifyid; >> +=09=09ret =3D idr_alloc(&rproc->notifyids, rvring, notifyid, >> +=09=09=09=09notifyid + 1, GFP_KERNEL); >> +=09=09if (ret < 0) { >> +=09=09=09dev_err(dev, "idr_alloc failed: %d\n", ret); >> +=09=09=09return ret; >> +=09=09} >> =09} >> -=09notifyid =3D ret; >> =20 >> =09/* Potentially bump max_notifyid */ >> =09if (notifyid > rproc->max_notifyid) >> @@ -366,8 +379,6 @@ int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int = i) >> =20 >> =09rvring->notifyid =3D notifyid; >> =20 >> -=09/* Let the rproc know the notifyid of this vring.*/ >> -=09rsc->vring[i].notifyid =3D notifyid; >> =09return 0; >> } > The rproc_free_vring function resets the notifyid to -1 on free. > This could generate a side effect if the resource table is not reloaded. Oh indeed, I did not thought of that. What would you recommend ? If using -1 in free vring, notify ids will be reallocated at next round. I was also worried that it would break some existing user applications which uses "0" as a notify id in vring but expect the id to be allocated dynamically. With my modification, it means it will try to=20 use "0" as a predefined id, leading to allocation failure. >=20 >> =20 >> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> index 16ad66683ad0..dcae3394243e 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h >> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ enum fw_resource_type { >> }; >> =20 >> #define FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY (-1) >> +#define FW_RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY (-1)This define can also be used in >> rproc_free_vring Indeed. Thanks for your review. Regards, Cl=C3=A9ment >=20 > Regards, > Arnaud >> =20 >> /** >> * struct fw_rsc_carveout - physically contiguous memory request