Re: [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: Address runtime PM issues

[Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>]

Hi Mathieu,

On 6/30/20 11:31 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This set follows the conversation that took place here[1] and provides
> the "two small patches" I alluded to at the end of the thread.
> 
> Paul Cercueil: patch 1/2 is compile tested only - please see that it does what
> you want.
> Suman Anna: Please test on your side and confirm that it addresses the Omap
> regression.

Tested the behavior with 5.8-rc3 + these patches, all looks good. Also 
provided by review tags on the individual patches.

regards
Suman

> 
> Applies on top of rproc-next (7dcef3988eed)
> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20200515104340.10473-1-paul@crapouillou.net/T/#t
> 
> Mathieu Poirier (2):
>    remoteproc: ingenic: Move clock handling to prepare/unprepare
>      callbacks
>    Revert "remoteproc: Add support for runtime PM"
> 
>   drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c   | 84 +++++++++-------------------
>   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 17 +-----
>   2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>