From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39633016E7 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 10:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771239227; cv=none; b=N19aP/AIywJnGPt+VcqpvrQYmvkyOFzrJBgrZPofHYriu1gRiPXuES8mx+UAdlOl1AwpQ14HFS45utJnnRTKrd4kxgS8QIbyMmc10vln0i2HIEYWqDT330B6nBLdex8dROBVw81U7iOfdqc3Lscjq+YxmTNWLMiHK9Xvii1q840= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771239227; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yiCrxtYWRStBcB48EVBaE3Qi59Fgvi3biq62nXCK5YU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nDs6qVLaiPkoaTEkeRcGp7P4rpjxLMtuJPBEA1UJ7BM6GWO5pNGzSIA692HD9qsGTuVA0L0klxj7LNkOWP2p9W2yfaoxkgalk+zfVDRnTa0x7dvKHEtVmYqEzAqPugqRzgs2TSubDJA2b3eIXSTnDHvFNGTPC5MAz4jJ5gd8lQM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=jz7SX77q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="jz7SX77q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=yiCr xtYWRStBcB48EVBaE3Qi59Fgvi3biq62nXCK5YU=; b=jz7SX77qvlrbNw4hCYfO yCt1rz9NMBX3YTdqNAfVGeZxI9+Zm+h2GlAMFRyMKl9wz1u+Ub98NVdPovxla7QN 5r0OcbuhkZHKECkQkJ+/b/7PvAFlM/zi4MM+y3ctN/Buiov/FAu3yCe53zWLbkX8 BjiCN7t4x6yiJgl6V6y0kplGJ0fzdkJFEgXJXHRyUh6vemc01G1h5MURkBp7sBdY nfSvkkCSax7aBUYlkrrzWaktywBBTvrNXmkfiFHBk3nKDBwhh1wxpKRhVhutjy9l 88OM9Ue2nsEdhsw9MEWthIAJE6kFGNY0ini5b6aQTP6h6gFn6XDZ+++7jU2MnAV9 tA== Received: (qmail 3207498 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2026 11:53:40 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 16 Feb 2026 11:53:40 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@2MaMxO5K3I4ujnu0 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 11:53:39 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Sergey Shtylyov , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bjorn Andersson , Baolin Wang , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] hwspinlock: add callback to fill private data of a hwspinlock Message-ID: References: <20260215225501.6365-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20260215225501.6365-3-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <6e495cc2-3469-4855-8645-c5633d937f1e@omp.ru> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > Is that the statistically most-used response to that question? ;-) That I don't know. I just know that I did build-testing for the whole series and the buildbots reported success. Need to look up why this was not caught. Sorry Sergey, you were right... Hmm, so is merging all the user-conversion patches into this one an option? Maybe the RFC here can be reviewed per-driver and the real patch set have this all merged?