Linux Remote Processor Subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>,
	Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] remoteproc: xlnx: initialize mailbox work before requesting channels
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:36:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amDjauVYktDLpAuJ@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717023108.4191518-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>

On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 10:31:08AM +0800, Runyu Xiao wrote:
> zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() installs zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb() as the mailbox RX
> callback before requesting the mailbox channels, but initializes
> ipi->mbox_work only after both channels have been requested. Once the RX
> channel is active, a notification delivered before the late INIT_WORK()
> would make the callback queue an uninitialized work item.
> 
> Initialize the work item before requesting channels. Also drain the work
> before freeing the mailbox state, after the channels have been released so
> no new callbacks can queue it.
> 
> This issue was found by our static analysis tool and then confirmed by
> manual review of the mailbox setup sequence. The callback is published
> before the channel requests complete, so the work item should be ready
> before the mailbox provider can invoke it.
> 
> A QEMU PoC modeled a mailbox notification delivered after the RX callback
> became reachable but before the delayed INIT_WORK(). DEBUG_OBJECTS reported
> queueing an uninitialized work item from the zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() path.
> 
> This is sent as an RFC because the practical trigger depends on the ZynqMP
> IPI mailbox provider and firmware delivery timing. If the provider cannot
> invoke the RX callback until after setup returns, this is a defensive
> lifecycle cleanup rather than a reachable race on current systems.
> 
> Fixes: 5dfb28c257b7 ("remoteproc: xilinx: Add mailbox channels for rpmsg")
> Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Follow Tanmay's suggestion and keep zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() taking the
>   child device pointer. Do not move the r5_core assignment in this patch.
> - Only move INIT_WORK() before channel requests and drain the work in
>   zynqmp_r5_free_mbox().
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 3349d1877751..e36918b8d234 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -279,6 +279,8 @@ static struct mbox_info *zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct device *cdev)
>  	if (!ipi)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	INIT_WORK(&ipi->mbox_work, handle_event_notified);
> +

This is the right thing to do but the error path for ipi->tx_chan and
ipi->rx_chan needs to be supplemented with a call to cancel_work_sync() to avoid
freeing 'ipi' without draining ipi->mbox_work.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  	mbox_cl = &ipi->mbox_cl;
>  	mbox_cl->rx_callback = zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb;
>  	mbox_cl->tx_block = false;
> @@ -305,8 +307,6 @@ static struct mbox_info *zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct device *cdev)
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	INIT_WORK(&ipi->mbox_work, handle_event_notified);
> -
>  	return ipi;
>  }
>  
> @@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ static void zynqmp_r5_free_mbox(struct mbox_info *ipi)
>  		ipi->rx_chan = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> +	cancel_work_sync(&ipi->mbox_work);
> +
>  	kfree(ipi);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-19  7:48 [RFC PATCH] remoteproc: xlnx: initialize mailbox work before requesting channels Runyu Xiao
2026-06-22 18:00 ` Shah, Tanmay
2026-07-17  2:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Runyu Xiao
2026-07-17 13:13   ` Shah, Tanmay
2026-07-22 15:36   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amDjauVYktDLpAuJ@p14s \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=tanmay.shah@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox