From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Robin Gong <b38343@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] watchdog: add watchdog pretimeout framework
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:37:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160526223717.GA6659@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160526164136.GB1631@katana>
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:41:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> No doubt about that. I had some ideas and thought it is easier to talk
> over code. If you want to rebase it, too, I'd be happy to check what you
> came up with to solve the problems. I might still argue that I prefer
> the less-code approach, but it will be Guenter's / Wim's decision, of
> course.
>
I have a large back-log of patches to review. Simple patches with less code
will get preferential treating. The more complex, the higher the likelyhood
that the patches get pushed to the end of the queue.
Giving a quick glance, I liked Wolfram's patches because they seemed to
be simple and straightforward. I hope the next version won't add too much
additional complexity.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-25 13:32 [PATCH 0/7] watchdog: add pretimeout support Wolfram Sang
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] watchdog: add watchdog pretimeout framework Wolfram Sang
2016-05-26 14:11 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-05-26 16:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-05-26 22:37 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-06-05 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-06-05 20:25 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] watchdog: pretimeout: add panic pretimeout governor Wolfram Sang
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] watchdog: pretimeout: add noop " Wolfram Sang
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] watchdog: documentation: squash paragraphs about 'no set_timeout' Wolfram Sang
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: add pretimeout support to the core Wolfram Sang
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs: compat_ioctl: add pretimeout functions for watchdogs Wolfram Sang
2016-05-25 13:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] watchdog: softdog: implement pretimeout support Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160526223717.GA6659@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=b38343@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).