From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:42331 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750926AbcFEJsb (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2016 05:48:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:48:23 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Robin Gong Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] watchdog: add watchdog pretimeout framework Message-ID: <20160605094823.GB1497@katana> References: <1464183151-4912-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1464183151-4912-2-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <5747041B.2050707@mentor.com> <20160526164136.GB1631@katana> <20160526223717.GA6659@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160526223717.GA6659@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 03:37:17PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:41:36PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > [ ... ] > >=20 > > No doubt about that. I had some ideas and thought it is easier to talk > > over code. If you want to rebase it, too, I'd be happy to check what you > > came up with to solve the problems. I might still argue that I prefer > > the less-code approach, but it will be Guenter's / Wim's decision, of > > course. > >=20 > I have a large back-log of patches to review. Simple patches with less co= de > will get preferential treating. The more complex, the higher the likelyho= od > that the patches get pushed to the end of the queue. >=20 > Giving a quick glance, I liked Wolfram's patches because they seemed to > be simple and straightforward. I hope the next version won't add too much > additional complexity. Vladimir, did you have time to look into this? I can offer to resend this series on-top of v4.7-rc1 with the core patch re-attributed to Vladimir. Then we can review the basic stuff now, and can discuss/deal with the bottom half handling incrementally. Sounds good? --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXU/VnAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2rUMP/j4Qduipn3DYN0XWDI8OOeT7 8S+gVrr8fblUFZpUtpEj7kBQDX2otOqlWYZptDUQcKqhfNcjaExq7PjoZsZ9t3ud f17Tq1QllNGSPAKBpNio9+ou3FblmGFYuLrg5Ic2bD6r5wVlE3LKLyiDtYk6tIbq V5wuuIGh0oHWrBQ7zzrOcrqKy4BHDtQqfkIS3luBe/+AOXMRFTMGifZ7UOm7i/qf SWhPe0hafFIyzkklAqtLGkbKSQ9y6wJyPy22NrAjNqtQ0WgXV7pKA6Ijl+ziRM3F bDBDBwLyg/sR7lGc4axjdWM9It32Uqy/YN4M9Xp3MIpANq4YuP+CjvtEUQw0e/Mj QmflosgIK83QKDg2JW1Z8BVJzvkQ+W6Qyv3pp8ZS0YrEIRqqjmmmS64kAQOs8C2e ogAG+lhLyTiOgPoogN7TBfaGC26cAf6YDtTJok2pg+s27RSZdqAY7mmolbeSnsrS ya8DboyTmm7L7KXyF8CnGvc05dmpIFASOvu+GhymlasqFz2V0TdGEjPMfga41627 DYa8Ug7mukemymVM6AdPxgCwaMNbn63/RB585u6jL2Hd6Rth2f3A8AF6xQdSHZXC mKz9iiww/OjQn3vKfVWVdlluKozy4Vjbc6PMCw1utxs/ACpF/g18gxVonayZyUc4 MBIJgpk3w5a9610kS3Av =t/3i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ--