From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Remove unneeded check in SMP initialization
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:27:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161007032754.GM13721@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6311567.Xmt6xgUBQy@avalon>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:04:39PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> On Wednesday 05 Oct 2016 13:25:12 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The SMP initialization function is only called if CONFIG_SMP is defined.
> > > Remove the duplicate check.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 ----
> > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c index 02e21bceb085..48595a397220
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > > @@ -39,9 +39,5 @@ bool shmobile_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> > >
> > > bool __init shmobile_smp_init_fallback_ops(void)
> > > {
> > > - /* fallback on PSCI/smp_ops if no other DT based method is
> > > detected */
> > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
> > > - return false;
> > > -
> > > return platform_can_secondary_boot() ? true : false;
> > > }
> >
> > This check was added recently, because the UP build was broken.
>
> I should have found that out. Sorry about the noise and thanks for the review.
I am discarding this patch. Let me know if that was not what you were
after.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-07 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-05 10:28 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Remove unneeded check in SMP initialization Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-05 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-10-05 13:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-10-07 3:27 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161007032754.GM13721@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox