From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c: reject transfers when adapter is suspended
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 23:59:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001215913.GA861@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53acc817-b982-6fc5-f5c1-5104968a2b33@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2229 bytes --]
> IMHO the is_suspended flag should be set by the adapter driver from its
> own suspend callback (which may be a normal, late or noirq suspend callback),
> as this is the point past which the bus should no longer be used because
> e.g. the suspend callbacks has disabled clocks and/or put the controller
> in reset, etc.
That's what I meant with "not seeing the woods for the trees". Thanks
for clearing my view!
> the i2c-controller device where necessary. But you're hooking into the
> child-device of the actual "hardware" device which represents the i2c_adapter
> bits.
That was intentional because this is the device the I2C core has access
to. Because the callbacks deal only with 'is_suspended' and not with HW,
I thought the logic device could be suitable. I didn't think of
additional relations only affecting its parent.
> on the adapter-device. I believe that instead we should add
> i2c_adapter_mark_suspended and i2c_adapter_mark_resumed helpers and let
> the adapter-driver suspend/resume callbacks call these. This will ensure
> that they get called at the right phase and at the exact moment that
> the adapter is actually suspending.
Agreed. And these helpers are basically this:
> > + i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
> > + adap->is_suspended = true;
> > + i2c_unlock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
and this:
> > + i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
> > + adap->is_suspended = false;
> > + i2c_unlock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER);
together with this still in the I2C core:
> > @@ -1867,6 +1904,9 @@ int __i2c_transfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
> > if (WARN_ON(!msgs || num < 1))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + if (WARN_ON(adap->is_suspended))
> > + return -ESHUTDOWN;
> > +
> > if (adap->quirks && i2c_check_for_quirks(adap, msgs, num))
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> > index 65b4eaed1d96..ee46295a67d4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> > @@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ struct i2c_adapter {
> > const struct i2c_adapter_quirks *quirks;
> > struct irq_domain *host_notify_domain;
> > +
> > + int is_suspended:1;
Are we aligned?
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-01 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-01 17:44 [RFC] i2c: reject transfers when adapter is suspended Wolfram Sang
2018-10-01 20:40 ` Hans de Goede
2018-10-01 21:59 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2018-10-01 22:52 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181001215913.GA861@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=preid@electromag.com.au \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox