From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: gpio: merge two very similar comments
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:42:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123184258.GC1708@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123101854.ps42vsgehusaimi5@verge.net.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1881 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:18:54AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:36:42PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > I think it is clear enough if we have the explanation once and make it
> > clear it is applicable for both SCL and SDA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c | 15 ++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
> > index c008d209f0b8..b9d43bc2853f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c
> > @@ -286,10 +286,10 @@ static int i2c_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > /*
> > * First get the GPIO pins; if it fails, we'll defer the probe.
> > - * If the SDA line is marked from platform data or device tree as
> > - * "open drain" it means something outside of our control is making
> > - * this line being handled as open drain, and we should just handle
> > - * it as any other output. Else we enforce open drain as this is
> > + * If the SCL/SDA lines are marked from platform data or device tree
> > + * as "open drain" it means something outside of our control is making
> > + * these lines being handled as open drain, and we should just handle
> > + * them as any other output. Else we enforce open drain as this is
> > * required for an I2C bus.
>
> <2c>
> If the SCL/SDA lines are marked "open drain" by platform data or
> device tree then this means that something outside of our control is
> marking these lines to be handled as open drain, and we should just
> handle them as we handle any other output. Else we enforce open
> drain as this is required for an I2C bus.
> </2c>
Cool, thanks Simon. Should I add your SoB when sending V2?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-19 11:36 [PATCH] i2c: gpio: merge two very similar comments Wolfram Sang
2019-01-23 10:18 ` Simon Horman
2019-01-23 18:42 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-01-24 11:39 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190123184258.GC1708@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox