From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EA1C43387 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 21:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD69B218FE for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 21:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730691AbeLTVKG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:10:06 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:58718 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728858AbeLTVKG (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 16:10:06 -0500 Received: from 89-77-194-223.dynamic.chello.pl (89.77.194.223) (HELO aspire.rjw.lan) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.183) id 90aa37423e1904d5; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 22:10:03 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Hans de Goede Cc: Wolfram Sang , Lukas Wunner , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] i2c: add suspended flag and accessors for i2c adapters Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 22:09:37 +0100 Message-ID: <2368540.q2jLLRDsj0@aspire.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20181219164827.20985-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20181219223341.GA998@kunai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, December 20, 2018 11:00:29 AM CET Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 19-12-18 23:33, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Hi Lukas, Hans, > > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 07:36:54PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 19-12-18 18:22, Lukas Wunner wrote: > >>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:48:17PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >>>> +static inline void i2c_mark_adapter_suspended(struct i2c_adapter *adap) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER); > >>>> + set_bit(I2C_ALF_IS_SUSPENDED, &adap->locked_flags); > >>>> + i2c_unlock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_ROOT_ADAPTER); > >>>> +} > >>> > >>> This looks like a duplication of the is_suspended flag in struct dev_pm_info. > >>> Any reason why you can't use that? If so, it would be good to document the > >>> reason in the commit message. > >> > >> Oh, that is a very good point and that one only gets set on system suspend > >> and not on resume suspend, working around the problems with the i2c-designware > > > > Just to make it clear: you mean runtime suspend, not resume suspend, or? > > Yes I mean runtime-suspend, sorry. The power.is_suspended flag is about system-wide suspend, however.