From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Kieran Bingham <kbingham@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] tests: Test suspend/resume on idle pipelines
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 19:13:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3575572.HLfbuMh0c7@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480082356-23380-5-git-send-email-kbingham@kernel.org>
Hi Kieran,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 25 Nov 2016 13:59:15 Kieran Bingham wrote:
> From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Provide a test to verify the hardware is functional both before and
> after entering a suspend / resume cycle. Make use of the
> /sys/power/pm_test functionality provided by CONFIG_PM_DEBUG to perform
> the testing
>
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> tests/vsp-unit-test-0019.sh | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/vsp-unit-test-0019.sh
>
> diff --git a/tests/vsp-unit-test-0019.sh b/tests/vsp-unit-test-0019.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..e7b94996c1aa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/vsp-unit-test-0019.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +#!/bin/sh
> +
> +#
> +# Test power-management suspend/resume whilst pipelines are idle
> +#
> +# Utilise the basic RPF->WPF packing test case as a measure that the
> hardware
> +# is operable while we perform test suspend and resume, and verify that it
> is
> +# still operable after resume.
> +#
> +# Format iteration loops are maintained, even with only one format so that
> this
> +# test can be easily extended to try further formats if needed in the
> future.
> +#
I don't think testing multiple formats is needed, but I would like the
test_wpf_packing() function to be called twice, to verify that stop -> start
works fine after resume. You could specify two formats to achieve that (with a
comment explaining why at least two formats should be specified).
> +source vsp-lib.sh
> +
> +features="rpf.0 wpf.0"
> +formats="RGB24"
> +
> +# These can be extracted from /sys/power/pm_test
> +suspend_modes="freezer devices platform processors core"
> +
> +test_wpf_packing() {
> + test_start "Verify WPF packing in $format before/after suspend:$mode"
> +
> + pipe_configure rpf-wpf 0 0
> + format_configure rpf-wpf 0 0 ARGB32 1024x768 $format
> +
> + vsp_runner rpf.0 &
> + vsp_runner wpf.0
> +
> + local result=$(compare_frames)
> +
> + test_complete $result
> +}
> +
> +test_hw_pipe() {
> + local format
> +
> + for format in $formats ; do
> + test_wpf_packing $format
> + done
> +}
> +
> +test_suspend_resume() {
> + local test_results=0
This variable is unused.
> +
> + # Test the hardware each side of suspend resume
> + test_hw_pipe
> +
> + # Set the test mode
> + echo $mode > /sys/power/pm_test
> +
> + # Comence suspend
> + # The pm_test framework will automatically resume after 5 seconds
> + echo mem > /sys/power/state
> +
> + # Verify the hardware is still operational
> + test_hw_pipe
Given that the goal is to test proper operation after resume, it would be
better to call test_start and test_complete in this function, based on whether
all the tests passed or not.
> +}
> +
> +test_main() {
> + local mode;
No need for the trailing ;.
> +
> + # Check for pm-suspend test option
> + if [ ! -e /sys/power/pm_test ] ; then
> + echo "$0: Suspend Resume testing requires CONFIG_PM_DEBUG"
> + test_complete skip
> + return
> + fi;
Ditto.
> +
> + for mode in $suspend_modes ; do
> + test_suspend_resume $mode
> + done;
Ditto.
> +}
> +
> +test_init $0 "$features"
> +test_run
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-25 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-25 13:59 [PATCH 0/5] VSP-Tests: Add suspend resume tests and helpers Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] scripts: Test suite runner Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 18:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-25 18:47 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] scripts: Provide bin2png.sh helper Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 17:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-25 18:04 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] logger: Log to the FTrace buffer if tracing is enabled Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 17:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-25 18:10 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 18:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-25 13:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] tests: Test suspend/resume on idle pipelines Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 17:13 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-11-25 18:14 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 13:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] tests: Test suspend/resume on active pipelines Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 17:10 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-11-25 18:40 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-11-25 19:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3575572.HLfbuMh0c7@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kbingham@kernel.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox