From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A0119D8AC for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2025 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754021101; cv=none; b=XTL8xxRGslHrk4p8UP5nNgk8T2CAHh6Yvkz386A06lTqor7LCekF282fZumjosNiA0NjgNedE0hcnd5FfWtDLEUc4ru5JlE250zZ9wphX3IAxogRR6ZnndRjOo5bayiE9jSzPW7xmXLqi8i9mrAgJYYyft4ffpyEEobJSSz1x3o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754021101; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QrZVxrl0B28V//etGcjReWqVqdV0F0vTZuRrdkPzZIk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lkcRV6adIDyfEunj4belrd60eE/VzOq5Pd0QDGl7iWhSMMdXeMyElokFHqdpeRm7gjDq9vfAkBzCuV3E8cPCmNgmx0vFJ5sA3qibu+mTYFFQh+jNFu178nQNpfHN0nZ4eW6n5Z5Az8Q3pOkxwBIw8BmuUSGezjlO/r8Ejj2ylAE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=CQBsV+ez; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="CQBsV+ez" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=QrZV xrl0B28V//etGcjReWqVqdV0F0vTZuRrdkPzZIk=; b=CQBsV+eziDOkMPVQ8cJI vifPVpZZlEbt9tnffYbqTE6dC/qsoxtoSkb6fLSsBKk8OR19dlIAxW+2jalbV1i1 dsv7QicuIYBXF6vtos6d8QcxcLr1GPu6BKPvIHSPfEuNPPH8giJCp4lw47W9IDVH QauAcD5EaK6/DA+ASgc8ZveJSb9T37gj9T3eEgsAuqH0UGw2VAovgEbV2YO94x4U 9dpPodAZwvmNGtuDKUAcpvelxPjgdje/DCUQ3D8idCGLks3DDnKHbWXbmvzdqEdz sH5nTvMXO/JkDeQIOH+qxF17KqisfO6qRSIUAUjGYt5ZUChCsTAtbi2TgCzl9SG3 1w== Received: (qmail 596386 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2025 06:04:57 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 1 Aug 2025 06:04:57 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@AGJv3EU7dtEujnum Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:04:56 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Prabhakar Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Philipp Zabel , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] watchdog: rzv2h_wdt: Make reset controller optional Message-ID: References: <20250729155915.67758-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20250729155915.67758-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hpM1e4SnNOaXCbKp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250729155915.67758-7-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --hpM1e4SnNOaXCbKp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 04:59:12PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar >=20 > Use devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() instead of > devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() to allow the driver to operate > on platforms where a reset controller is not present. >=20 > This change is in preparation for supporting the RZ/T2H SoC, which > does not have reset. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar I'd suggest to merge this with patch 4. Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang --hpM1e4SnNOaXCbKp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmiMPOgACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYN4BAAnQT5PS3XnOt0/kwZrILLl7AO5HsZkhAau0i75SuUMqI5F36Z5pw0xRF5 Z/Blwb0//lu+B4V5reknR6JLcWiSXCavGhReD/UIDPNnhWikd/rIvHKExPpi+uRk svd9VMs9b3VzOa6W3mA4gLcJoua4lAqwhEyMTwhC5JIBC0aTbIfV6Ui4+SDh8qAn JUJvxvwWWoB0VFWz1KersenWFDkvXCPIg5yQR2PCPaJrlXPYO558dVAot0cEyQZZ b+6EJ+QUC0BuXa4REwEjooDEWx5eHxw646LelCLoop0KWldaYZa7AW/rmt6ff55l qMvhneGEi6DQz4EdCqPnUoX73DtQyZVvg5rYTq6Unj3lj5/C20iyo8duKAOzCsuV TuPk13IX7JpXe3QRZyzgkKKhzAmxuY9PazdiQMop9Ol+Otrwwhn3RyGIqvuSuq8u tm4Lugm+VVPWuk0EaWHqZTadeYJM/7b87TDSnw5B10b4/gGZER2s9otO/2GzypfZ Iumadpc+7sfN44cIRPQSGL+WVC3pPbDdnWfnm6cCCNrtdHJ7a4a5t67Cc62ilgUO jBV52LybwlWfox+4yEB8ytBwdd8tARjUbE5fJApLHp28cYsr14+qWzifBqyNYIIb yT/8BlSqIgEibXoiLa1ceEGumnYhzxWUKaXjYAs5lIK830rgyhY= =2SMx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hpM1e4SnNOaXCbKp--