From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46922F7F15; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 16:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788886091; cv=none; b=h0NEiKxL1vbPczXQbGHLBvwNyiCH//tIGH/4pWo+CBhs5CwsQZWQ7cuR5FCNudm9O7lL7DyqQeIJMqdfuvo7/Yf7jvKQ7R/N+ogWlmmaanvxjDCjfAqyLMHbKYnxV9U4jEjvcLwD29si0JaPfZqvoueOCy2y5J79TnF2I24ak5w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788886091; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oCZyJKPKglN7J/PhlviJQyC6+4urCqLrabtRklNMC/4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WKGt8HMcyvqdvOIFAfySCxQpa7oooe8VQKV6ef9oKpT7PZMFWdGN9KS4xGitUb0LJu3YG1gih7eSsmontsYkhiPcJL+eg2tfEKWFq4MgPD4uAxUH06j+dNh4BclrqrE1YanIgfRk8/poUfdvxrqJ9BSZN8NqHJE8cRf7/I0a+ZM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=FFx8GxvX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="FFx8GxvX" Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4hfVHV4Hg8zMlBX; Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:48:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1788886086; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mBNavf/W3lZrxPMwGNFSc+f7vCLC4CALQ5e8BPseE7s=; b=FFx8GxvXl/s/MWiZUYz39+Xv0nvzYvMIADDnZ0BbhtEJUNB8PlbqfXlAwJFJtXM/iIBQf3 mkUmuzeTVJYbwWhglslgN4xo8fepNP0yVgHswx+GEGqFlYy4iahDbsCS+87ckjbPqRwVZk s2xTrNU1mJbYMobZMeHvVAJZ0FbMIx/BgkRKTtcCL9coTIlmFZt4FMjTUDk3geMl1NhlFL jrf19jxCvQhH0FnymCi1DZYEI2B608RpUCpa5mBRGyUwh73wRwy+d0QUreGR2FRKLQPY+g eoXcLmSiNSSua5x1ZyZ+T1GJnzXMLKlSwabXdMKIpWFCshrRZ5HQn1lb9aEP7g== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 18:48:02 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Add support for Ilitek ILI79600A-based panels To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Neil Armstrong , Dave Stevenson Cc: Conor Dooley , David Airlie , Jessica Zhang , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , Simona Vetter , Thomas Zimmermann , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20260820185506.84448-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <20260820185506.84448-4-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: <20260820185506.84448-4-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-META: hkf7ukp56y8zazyspe65q1jobg1mdcct X-MBO-RS-ID: b9e5883bb32405da422 On 8/20/26 8:54 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > The Ilitek ILI79600A display controller is similar to the ILI9882T and can > be supported within the existing `panel-ilitek-ili9882t.c` driver. > > This patch extends the ILI9882T driver to handle ILI79600A-based panels, > such as the 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2. The ILI79600A uses a similar > command sequence and initialization flow, with minor differences in power > supply configuration and timing. Should I still change anything with this patchset ? Thank you for your help !