From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, philip.radford@arm.com,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@foss.st.com,
peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com,
marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] SCMI Clock rates discovery rework
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 13:08:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aabdXvaSlu1EDgG4@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW9dtAnT2E103kp1zK=LJrER7k1ib8_WPk5aorPRw80uQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:25:00PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
>
> Thanks for your series!
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 at 16:33, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
> > it was a known limitation, in the SCMI Clock protocol support, the lack of
> > dynamic allocation around per-clock rates discovery: fixed size statically
> > per-clock rates arrays did not scale and was increasingly a waste of memory
> > (see [1]).
> >
> > This series aim at solving this in successive steps:
> >
> > - simplify and reduce to the minimum possible the rates data info exposed
> > to the SCMI driver by scmi_clock_info
> > - move away from static fixed allocation of per-clock rates arrays in
> > favour of a completely dynamic runtime allocation: just allocate what
> > is needed based on the effectively discovered
> >
> > This is done in patches 1-6.
> >
> > A further bigger optimization suggested in a past series [1] by Etienne
>
> s/[1]/[2]/
>
> > would be, whenever allowed by the spec, to limit upfront the number of
> > queries in order to simply retrieve min and max rate, that are indeed the
> > only rates needed by the CLK SCMI driver.
> >
> > The approach proposed in [1] was open coding and duplicating some of the
>
> What does [1] refer to?
I messed up the refs..of course...it was just a reference to your thread
where the number of rates where staticallty raised to 64.
>
> > functionalities already provided by SCMI iterators, though.
> >
> > Patch 7-10 implement such optimization instead by:
> >
> > - reworking core SCMI iterators to support bound enumerations
> > - use such new bound iterators to perform the minimum number of queries
> > in order to ony retrieve min an max rate
> >
> > As a final result now the rates enumeration triggered by the CLK SCMI
> > driver, while still allocating for all the existent rates, miminize the
> > number of SCMI CLK_DESCRIBE_RATE messages needed to obtain min and max.
> >
> > Finally, patch 11 introduces a new clock protocol operation to be able to
> > trigger anytime on demand a full enumeration and obtain the full list of
> > rates when needed, not only min/max: this latter method is really only used
> > currently by some dowstream SCMI Test driver of mine.
> >
> > Based on v7.0-rc1.
> >
> > Tested on JUNO and an emulated environment.
>
> Thank you, this removes the need for increasing SCMI_MAX_NUM_RATES on
> R-Car X5H, while decreasing memory usage.
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
Thanks for testing in the real world !
Cristian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-27 15:32 [PATCH 00/11] SCMI Clock rates discovery rework Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add clock determine_rate operation Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-28 10:07 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 0:27 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 10:13 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-02 12:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-03 12:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 02/11] clk: scmi: Use new determine_rate clock operation Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 0:56 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 10:23 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-02 17:11 ` Brian Masney
2026-03-03 2:54 ` Peng Fan
2026-03-03 12:47 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-02 12:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-03 12:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Simplify clock rates exposed interface Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:07 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 10:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-02 12:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-02 13:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-03 12:42 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-03 12:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] clk: scmi: Use new simplified per-clock rate properties Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:12 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop unused clock rate interfaces Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:13 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Make clock rates allocation dynamic Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:29 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 10:36 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Harden clock parents discovery Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:39 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 10:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor iterators internal allocation Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 09/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add bound iterators support Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:44 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 2:43 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-02-28 10:42 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 10/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Use bound iterators to minimize discovered rates Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 16:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-28 10:43 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-02-27 15:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce all_rates_get clock operation Cristian Marussi
2026-02-28 2:49 ` Peng Fan
2026-02-28 10:47 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-02 7:18 ` Peng Fan
2026-03-02 10:47 ` Cristian Marussi
2026-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH 00/11] SCMI Clock rates discovery rework Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-03 13:08 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aabdXvaSlu1EDgG4@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=etienne.carriere@foss.st.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=philip.radford@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox