From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10A8C4360F for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993EF2177E for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="jT3A1R3t" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727485AbfCKNib (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:38:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:40720 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727971AbfCKNib (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:38:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id g20so4278522wmh.5 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=schwPfgvBQobp2WA+XcmZ8hx+CMnepppt1zErxlagGE=; b=jT3A1R3tvjpiFEBW1qukAU0t+mOGyxaw2dUZ9l8bmeUFhtFIVeVHSLdMM9XxH1p1uo zYZ9qYlrsXLZ9U3dXD6lbqIbSa/9TayqtUrRAb/Yt/BjD/bCCf5rZpkaHLZRuSSGIYes 0V/wJcNFMALWbycFPWqufYVqhzheOR/UfEaoJjdmYQQQoNXbyLOY/z6721rq06dfrpPq +YWwn7uHpyM3kC0LlX52lLJLeOfC+tDGSP535o9y6CAW1TlVH0ZaWhvxJ57yxCmz05gv O9/eeGGIRJcg5jv0FtA4xvPpP3Zhchqilr+LCu5PgT6+Ah3hyxM/VGnKAA/ZwMs5qFWG VKaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=schwPfgvBQobp2WA+XcmZ8hx+CMnepppt1zErxlagGE=; b=t1qdfMM/+j+9nnJRB1c8zI+nhYaagsiB5Qt+kgdBKCHJ73z5ilRZp/0qzKaika4+Yy r8PROh0ZocB6h38eh1QN7QzGN1gHYlkkqLhmxAwBqt1UEg6KaZlQm7XeY96S/LeafkZn NygqBLXoscJ2KK6E5SwDNScXvWuN8XB7Tg6kBHhkFklITNTdro9Agl7N0NtvoJfjddbp uAj/6OAKao2o6U5r09P+H6GOeZhgmOW4lgj0AIFj7iHLbqCPOIYVgWW8NFviwHqrLude 76ug0eOthGdw0jX8J5DM9tJc0CzxnYpRLYY5IKjVuUlWM7IKILu70RAu+WvcdTDGsz1X jdgg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUeEChpVxiWkx7r+DjVqlVfT79MVIZfReXBzV0/AdLbetkB34GK fwVL7WZnFY4n5d+8x1MlS5HqQzYW X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhuEbBZtLwsEtBJsiYPNVTLHcFvq8/0CN+zlT6iH4cdFI6406VhWPoMewaJ7O8GbySEDYKew== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c344:: with SMTP id l4mr17055840wmj.121.1552311508618; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ip-86-49-110-70.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.110.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y66sm29919319wmd.37.2019.03.11.06.38.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77995: draak: Enable CAN0, CAN1 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux ARM , Marek Vasut , Geert Uytterhoeven , Simon Horman , Wolfram Sang , Linux-Renesas References: <20190309020642.15985-1-marek.vasut@gmail.com> From: Marek Vasut Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:38:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On 3/11/19 10:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 3:06 AM wrote: >> From: Marek Vasut >> >> Enable both CAN0 and CAN1 controllers on R8A77995 Draak board, >> since they are available on connectors CN43, CN44 respectively. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > Thanks for your patch! > I assume you have tested this with your CAN-analyzer? Nope, only remotely between two CAN ports thus far. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut