From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
fkan@apm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artemi Ivanov <artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: let arch know origin of dma range passed to arch_setup_dma_ops()
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:43:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3fcd74b-7264-7ff2-4f70-7bf4235302de@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3273119.LjYLKcrNcz@wuerfel>
On 12/01/17 13:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, January 12, 2017 12:16:24 PM CET Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:52:51AM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c
>>>>> index 5ac373c..480b644 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-mc/bus/fsl-mc-bus.c
>>>>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct dprc_obj_desc *obj_desc,
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Objects are coherent, unless 'no shareability' flag set. */
>>>>> if (!(obj_desc->flags & DPRC_OBJ_FLAG_NO_MEM_SHAREABILITY))
>>>>> - arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, NULL, true);
>>>>> + arch_setup_dma_ops(&mc_dev->dev, 0, 0, false, NULL, true);
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * The device-specific probe callback will get invoked by device_add()
>>>>
>>>> Why are these actually calling arch_setup_dma_ops() here in the first
>>>> place? Are these all devices that are DMA masters without an OF node?
>>>
>>> I don't know, but that's a different topic. This patch just adds
>>> argument and sets it to false everywhere but in the location when range
>>> should be definitely enforced.
>>
>> I also wouldn't lose any sleep over a staging driver.
>
> I think this is in the process of being moved out of staging, and
> my question was about the other two as well:
The fsl-mc is actually a sort-of-bus-controller probing and configuring
its (directly DMA-capable) child devices, so is in fact legitimate here.
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
That one is completely bogus, and should just go away.
> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
That one is part of some ugly trickery involving creating a fake device
to represent multiple separate IOMMU devices. The driver could probably
be reworked to not need it (the Exynos IOMMU handles a similar situation
without such tricks), but it's non-trivial.
Robin.
>
> Arnd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-09 7:30 [PATCH v2] arm64: do not set dma masks that device connection can't handle Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-10 11:51 ` Will Deacon
2017-01-10 12:47 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-10 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-10 13:25 ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-10 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-10 14:16 ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-10 15:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-11 12:37 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-11 16:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-11 18:28 ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-10 14:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 14:00 ` [PATCH] arm64: avoid increasing DMA masks above what hardware supports Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-10 17:14 ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-11 7:59 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-11 11:54 ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-11 13:41 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-11 14:50 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <105b0b38-8c48-3355-4951-435c5dca18a4@cogentembedded.com>
2017-01-11 16:50 ` Robin Murphy
2017-01-11 18:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: fix handling of DMA masks wider than bus supports Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-11 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: let arch know origin of dma range passed to arch_setup_dma_ops() Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-11 21:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-12 5:52 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-12 6:33 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-12 13:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-12 13:39 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-12 12:16 ` Will Deacon
2017-01-12 13:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-12 13:43 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2017-01-13 10:40 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-11 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: avoid increasing DMA masks above what hardware supports Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-11 21:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-01-12 5:53 ` Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-13 10:16 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-10 14:01 ` [PATCH v2] arm64: do not set dma masks that device connection can't handle Nikita Yushchenko
2017-01-10 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-10 14:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3fcd74b-7264-7ff2-4f70-7bf4235302de@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=fkan@apm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox