From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] x86/mm: Make memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) map memory as encrypted by default
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:23:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <079cb87c-78aa-5fb5-b28f-e7a54e51aa78@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bz3vlh3lri7yfckdkddopwhsgvkmizhw5q6ecomgeba7q22ufp@ntu2kugiho4o>
On 12/10/24 07:26, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:49:52PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> Sure, we can workaround every place that touches such ranges.
>>
>> Every place? Which every place? I thought this is only an EISA issue?
>
> I looked at other places where we call memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) such as
> acpi_wakeup_cpu(). We actually get encrypted/private mapping for this
> callsite despite __ioremap_caller() being called encrypted == false.
> This happens because of IORES_MAP_ENCRYPTED check in __ioremap_caller().
>
> So we depend on the BIOS here. The EISA problem happens because the
> target memory is in !IORES_MAP_ENCRYPTED memory.
>
> It's hard to say if any other memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) would trigger the
> issue. And what will happen after next BIOS update.
>
>> Then clearly your changelogs need to expand considerably more what we're
>> *really* addressing here.
>>
>>> Or we can address problem at the root and make creating decrypted/shared
>>> mappings explicit.
>>
>> What is the problem? That KVM implicitly converts memory to shared? Why does
>> KVM do that an can it be fixed not to?
>>
>> Doesn't sound like the guest's problem.
>
> Well, the problem is on the both sides.
>
> VMM behaviour on such accesses is not specified in any spec. AFAIK all
> current VMM implementations do this implicit conversion.
>
> I think it has to be fixed. VMMs (not only KVM) should not silently
> convert memory to shared. But VMMs cannot make memory access to go away.
> The only option they have is to inject #VE instead indicating bogus
> access. At this point it becomes a guest problem.
>
> It will get fixed in VMMs naturally when TDX Connect gets enabled.
> With a secure device assigned to a TD, VMM would loose the ability to
> convert memory on its own. The guest would have to unlock the memory
> first. This will make implicit conversion impossible.
>
> But it also means guest should never initiate shared access without
> explicit conversion. Otherwise #VE will crash it.
>
>> Or maybe this needs a lot more explanation what we're fixing here.
>>
>>> Such mappings have both functional (as we see here) and security
>>> implications (VMM can manipulate the guest memory range). We should not
>>> create decrypted mappings by default on legacy interfaces.
>>
>> So we're getting closer.
>>
>> The changes themselves are fine but your text is missing a lot about what
>> we're fixing here. When I asked, I barely scratched the surface. So can we
>> elaborate here pls?
>
> What about this:
>
> x86/mm: Make memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) map memory as encrypted by default
>
> Currently memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) can produce decrypted/shared mapping:
>
> memremap(MEMREMAP_WB)
> arch_memremap_wb()
> ioremap_cache()
> __ioremap_caller(.encrytped = false)
That's because try_ram_remap() invokes arch_memremap_can_ram_remap()
which is returning false (for some reason).
When arch_memremap_can_ram_remap() returns false, ioremap_cache() is
invoked. ioremap() should provide shared mappings unless specifically
requested to provide an encrypted mapping (via encrypted parameter) or
if __ioremap_check_mem() determines that an encrypted mapping is needed.
Can logic be added to arch_memremap_can_ram_remap() to return true for
the cases that TDX is having issues with?
Thanks,
Tom
>
> In such cases, the IORES_MAP_ENCRYPTED flag on the memory will determine
> if the resulting mapping is encrypted or decrypted.
>
> Creating a decrypted mapping without explicit request from the caller is
> risky:
>
> - It can inadvertently expose the guest's data and compromise the
> guest.
>
> - Accessing private memory via shared/decrypted mapping on TDX will
> either trigger implicit conversion to shared or #VE (depending on
> VMM implementation).
>
> Implicit conversion is destructive: subsequent access to the same
> memory via private mapping will trigger a hard-to-debug #VE crash.
>
> The kernel already provides a way to request decrypted mapping
> explicitly via the MEMREMAP_DEC flag.
>
> Modify memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) to produce encrypted/private mapping by
> default unless MEMREMAP_DEC is specified.
>
> This change fixes the crash on kexec in TDX guests if CONFIG_EISA is
> enabled.
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241021105723.2707507-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
2024-10-29 15:11 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] x86/mm: Make memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) map memory as encrypted by default Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-11-18 9:43 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
[not found] ` <20241021105723.2707507-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
2024-11-18 16:46 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] " Borislav Petkov
2024-11-19 8:21 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-11-21 11:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-10 13:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-12-12 14:23 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2024-12-13 11:59 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-13 10:03 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] x86/mm: Make memremap(MEMREMAP_WB) map memory as encrypted by defaultk Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-01-13 10:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-01-13 12:22 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=079cb87c-78aa-5fb5-b28f-e7a54e51aa78@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ericchancf@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ytcoode@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox