From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7293BEE14AA for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 21:39:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LA2+9HEhkTfy/blx/1rDDg+d2QVOKAnpTIgV9yXyKgc=; b=qiYtFyQz5ggq9L UplV1t7KV7y5aczEdFkl3yWx6Bln2Jj6zBRoGTp9UU4vRfRezAT12+UptvKCuw74Aq+osKWoT3RsT 1NTk/L+UjXKTPSvhsQABHHy2HdFanoNSaTk8KHnIQGZbQLJj8L5HoCbrC2EYsDUajpnk48e/DUgQL c7JB4pEYH4Ky4IKRWyhY2XoFbkVKBrbpB2YlYr1ne17qITPPD4nTmP1bDxLVA9rNGOYqUJbbXGupR TFjh9i/oI7C1nvJKi4b+y012EbFdsWFbbIBTMkRoPcPELQYh/R0AyRsZC+LJ1UfGbUgyGI/MQzh6Q 2kQ5vhiw5jLuJUiUX93A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qf5fN-00FpQN-2q; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 21:38:57 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qf5fL-00FpPn-0h for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2023 21:38:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C205CE01DD; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 21:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9532EC433C8; Sat, 9 Sep 2023 21:38:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1694295530; bh=5fU1vfnX5/y7qCl6GytMi3XTMVYX9SNS1qWWCb3S6jQ=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UcShGcp4uEqcsIQP42m5AMdjrR310GdEeuL11Bs7dKHpSk8EILB2LizO0pY63S2lG d6JVp/6Pox23jSzOAsgWCzcKJiAy/dwAK2N2Dbc5bObNiJ8KbNrqPpBOokEDzQveMG IaMcJRYZXda6CpgwWv85/vbhrRdLm7CGXYuQqUL3psVAhiM+xCT9tXwM0vaz5PQrql uUtyIRYnFw+slnClKYsTAucXrySRpEFXtRH3TPcxCDhw8n0GBiucRPzbl5GA0PItuV dvAAFHWn2amXa/lZPyz5xvPHLPGZnmm32WlBA71owojkJvibblI9/mbYSaad/IawgM 8Nl/nOvtvqdYQ== Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2023 22:38:47 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Samuel Holland , Jiexun Wang CC: guoren@kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, falcon@tinylab.org, jszhang@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: =?US-ASCII?Q?Re=3A_=5BPATCH_v2=5D_RISC-V=3A_Fix_use_of_non_e?= =?US-ASCII?Q?xistent_CONFIG=5FHAVE=5FSOFTIRQ=5FON=5FOWN=5FSTACK?= User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <0e270067-cd2d-ecd0-512b-5dce4865fa4c@sholland.org> References: <20230906123216.255932-1-wangjiexun@tinylab.org> <0e270067-cd2d-ecd0-512b-5dce4865fa4c@sholland.org> Message-ID: <12294913-FC23-47F5-AB73-BDBD19F65C87@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230909_143855_455875_9A22C8C6 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.19 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 9 September 2023 22:20:41 IST, Samuel Holland wrote: >Hi, > >The patch is correct, though the subject isn't quite accurate. >CONFIG_HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK exists; it is defined in arch/Kconfig. >It's just the wrong option to use to guard the function definition. That's partially my fault, I suggested using something along these lines on the previous version. I blame being supposed to be on holidays! _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv