From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3A4C433DB for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6639A6510A for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6639A6510A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:From:Cc:To: Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=3paotYZRd5fbJG0vZYkaSUpGqa3RSjjbFBPytKtjpK8=; b=BPlmstc9ZiE71wHzmmbJKqk8b vlU+FGvEIDogaQcAsQakqP92RGeh1w0XwC9cqhEk1PjShKkKaMrIAC0mYZVq8RvTJPPtgkHlOU++L l9dPgklw0OxS6MamrmHHnVcXk2eKX8mrai6V++AKHupNlshQXq7g948YFKhoMkgzyHfzPEOGKDpB/ Q2jNJWBpdr0jtRzEmqfQhl9vlF1hUGWNCWpuHXVnlAg2t5FEjis6KB+nQV6ysByXq1qV7m9Ev8+Q6 GY72T+K40IL9OY3QxsbszwnJxQRJ0wrH43GFFJlYVt1Zti3EgglKht374TaqzSl2lKyrEa42BlyXl Q/mz0WB/w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lIvJJ-00AgkC-2T; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:27:13 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lIvIE-00AgBV-4h; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:26:08 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 368C06510B; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 15:26:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1615130764; bh=VtBjEo0zEeDv9tbI3zY4IslFCCnMQh5OMJhOT1qFneA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DFSvvDKazLqNmh2jokzcNR+6l4KyHmJ7XYhdLSvi+XXWKsvJEK491VLgN8cjZmP4y 7X4J33qh6669qNGj9R9p4tJFmMoUsotUQRyJJIcdsJEBq/oBYziiv6mkr2sk05GhQA sPGZL6zSCjoHn/ETUcXgSVcGKc4CuPzVm83sfgB8= Subject: Patch "of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, ardb@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, guohanjun@huawei.com, guro@fb.com, jingxiangfeng@huawei.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, will@kernel.org Cc: From: Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 16:25:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> Message-ID: <161513074613785@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: commit X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210307_152606_651308_AEE9450B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let know about it. >From foo@baz Sun Mar 7 04:22:37 PM CET 2021 From: Jing Xiangfeng Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:33:16 +0800 Subject: of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Cc: , , , , , , , , , Rob Herring Message-ID: <20210303073319.2215839-5-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne commit 07d13a1d6120d453c3c1f020578693d072deded5 upstream Introduce a test for of_dma_get_max_cup_address(), it uses the same DT data as the rest of dma-ranges unit tests. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Reviewed-by: Rob Herring Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119175400.9995-5-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Cc: Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -869,6 +869,23 @@ static void __init of_unittest_changeset #endif } +static void __init of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void) +{ + struct device_node *np; + phys_addr_t cpu_addr; + + np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/address-tests"); + if (!np) { + pr_err("missing testcase data\n"); + return; + } + + cpu_addr = of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(np); + unittest(cpu_addr == 0x4fffffff, + "of_dma_get_max_cpu_address: wrong CPU addr %pad (expecting %x)\n", + &cpu_addr, 0x4fffffff); +} + static void __init of_unittest_dma_ranges_one(const char *path, u64 expect_dma_addr, u64 expect_paddr) { @@ -3266,6 +3283,7 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void) of_unittest_changeset(); of_unittest_parse_interrupts(); of_unittest_parse_interrupts_extended(); + of_unittest_dma_get_max_cpu_address(); of_unittest_parse_dma_ranges(); of_unittest_pci_dma_ranges(); of_unittest_match_node(); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jingxiangfeng@huawei.com are queue-5.10/of-unittest-add-test-for-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch queue-5.10/mm-remove-examples-from-enum-zone_type-comment.patch queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-devicetree-s-dma-ranges.patch queue-5.10/of-address-introduce-of_dma_get_max_cpu_address.patch queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-zone_dma_bits-initialization-into-zone_sizes_init.patch queue-5.10/arm64-mm-set-zone_dma-size-based-on-early-iort-scan.patch queue-5.10/arm64-mm-move-reserve_crashkernel-into-mem_init.patch _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv