Patch "arm64: topology: move store_cpu_topology() to shared code" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    arm64: topology: move store_cpu_topology() to shared code

to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     arm64-topology-move-store_cpu_topology-to-shared-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From foo@baz Thu Oct 27 12:19:05 PM CEST 2022
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:52:09 +0100
Subject: arm64: topology: move store_cpu_topology() to shared code
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>, <atishp@atishpatra.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-ID: <20221019125209.2844943-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com>

From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

commit 456797da792fa7cbf6698febf275fe9b36691f78 upstream.

arm64's method of defining a default cpu topology requires only minimal
changes to apply to RISC-V also. The current arm64 implementation exits
early in a uniprocessor configuration by reading MPIDR & claiming that
uniprocessor can rely on the default values.

This is appears to be a hangover from prior to '3102bc0e6ac7 ("arm64:
topology: Stop using MPIDR for topology information")', because the
current code just assigns default values for multiprocessor systems.

With the MPIDR references removed, store_cpu_topolgy() can be moved to
the common arch_topology code.

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c |   40 ----------------------------------------
 drivers/base/arch_topology.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -21,46 +21,6 @@
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/topology.h>
 
-void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
-{
-	struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
-	u64 mpidr;
-
-	if (cpuid_topo->package_id != -1)
-		goto topology_populated;
-
-	mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
-
-	/* Uniprocessor systems can rely on default topology values */
-	if (mpidr & MPIDR_UP_BITMASK)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * This would be the place to create cpu topology based on MPIDR.
-	 *
-	 * However, it cannot be trusted to depict the actual topology; some
-	 * pieces of the architecture enforce an artificial cap on Aff0 values
-	 * (e.g. GICv3's ICC_SGI1R_EL1 limits it to 15), leading to an
-	 * artificial cycling of Aff1, Aff2 and Aff3 values. IOW, these end up
-	 * having absolutely no relationship to the actual underlying system
-	 * topology, and cannot be reasonably used as core / package ID.
-	 *
-	 * If the MT bit is set, Aff0 *could* be used to define a thread ID, but
-	 * we still wouldn't be able to obtain a sane core ID. This means we
-	 * need to entirely ignore MPIDR for any topology deduction.
-	 */
-	cpuid_topo->thread_id  = -1;
-	cpuid_topo->core_id    = cpuid;
-	cpuid_topo->package_id = cpu_to_node(cpuid);
-
-	pr_debug("CPU%u: cluster %d core %d thread %d mpidr %#016llx\n",
-		 cpuid, cpuid_topo->package_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
-		 cpuid_topo->thread_id, mpidr);
-
-topology_populated:
-	update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
 {
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -538,4 +538,23 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
 	else if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
 		reset_cpu_topology();
 }
+
+void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
+{
+	struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
+
+	if (cpuid_topo->package_id != -1)
+		goto topology_populated;
+
+	cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
+	cpuid_topo->core_id = cpuid;
+	cpuid_topo->package_id = cpu_to_node(cpuid);
+
+	pr_debug("CPU%u: package %d core %d thread %d\n",
+		 cpuid, cpuid_topo->package_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
+		 cpuid_topo->thread_id);
+
+topology_populated:
+	update_siblings_masks(cpuid);
+}
 #endif


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from conor.dooley@microchip.com are

queue-5.4/arm64-topology-move-store_cpu_topology-to-shared-code.patch
queue-5.4/riscv-topology-fix-default-topology-reporting.patch

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv