Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: add a spin_shadow_stack declaration - patchwork-bot+linux-riscv

From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com, guoren@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: add a spin_shadow_stack declaration
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:00:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <167707802209.24438.2348901330563496551.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230210185945.915806-1-conor@kernel.org>

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 18:59:45 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> The patchwork automation reported a sparse complaint that
> spin_shadow_stack was not declared and should be static:
> ../arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c:335:15: warning: symbol 'spin_shadow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> However, this is used in entry.S and therefore shouldn't be static.
> The same applies to the shadow_stack that this pseudo spinlock is
> trying to protect, so do like its charge and add a declaration to
> thread_info.h
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v1] RISC-V: add a spin_shadow_stack declaration
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/eb9be8310c58

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv