From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D07C47077 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-Id:From:Subject:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZpTBfSXBLg8g5Dh0WbLe9KVBUE5WAfrawrXmxzws6vA=; b=wrYQ29elWgBMzf lCdE8eoHX4Goie6yVk6cooC0LHMv1y89l/gXAayVzYjVnIvsw2QXBFidDtrLtim7NEkqxWzSszhKK ME/8C9ydUI4USikwg2RgTlQc7ED4BrKnCxF15piRSMun1IGw7Xa4J3OwWl+xtyXcUZQW+JvFTV3Ld 6U+fjgaY3KKtk6BLJ98gxn6y8dAZ5SmHJear0FMY8XZipETBPMOWUIR4wDsOTCRC4Pr1O7IlTyc1X +GOUaN9UPWcfQzQmXgWzPf/LUCpYi5r6zYVQXrauI3CS5H5aHhFFAi2NmrqFvuFJmDh1tihVoxggc e9RnPVeIww/KTFr034Ng==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rNxAW-000TRC-1n; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:32 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rNxAT-000TQ5-19 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFE3B8206A; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CC4C433F1; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704987627; bh=zUUw91RjsXsTZYU7IzR/N1+v3essx1rs3BbSwsHr3oU=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=j7I8+XcKYl48Q3tHezghtFOktVKpj6TFmWK7ccynETAiyfnOqsGnP/Q9Iu0BXadsd iL/5U18CnjNqeOTFLMRcO7dyDu8wDpOhmcvxgYzfB7GgyW+urtq4aOjcup4eUXgMVe 4nQ55V5dJZApSrQVYGxecLnsmkBEpG+UJLBmiP+/TJ0Ah+yuKtoTLPowkW7Ivaj16c 0FdgLy2bMlt/p3KkpeIDTcWtOL4dDlgPkH4JDZPp/6n/kRDkIg9m28pqLnvAqC9k3S swIKfT6e/KikHBROddxFbJagZW5VNq98IJfqTiTBVWAMVV/D0G+VPjt/KbuLL27zZs c+jxI8XVr7bPA== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E270DFC698; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: riscv: Document cbop-block-size From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org Message-Id: <170498762718.16494.12898852163164457210.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:27 +0000 References: <20231029123500.739409-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20231029123500.739409-1-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> To: Daniel Henrique Barboza Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, robh@kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240111_074029_537660_29E0729A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.08 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello: This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) by Palmer Dabbelt : On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 09:35:00 -0300 you wrote: > Following the examples of cbom-block-size and cboz-block-size, > cbop-block-size is the cache size of Zicbop (cbo.prefetch) operations. > The most common case is to have all cache block sizes to be the same > size (e.g. profiles such as rva22u64 mandates a 64 bytes size for all > cache operations), but there's no specification requirement for that, > and an implementation can have different cache sizes for each operation. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - dt-bindings: riscv: Document cbop-block-size https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/d3e591a38c98 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv