Re: [PATCH 0/6] Restructure per-task CFI prctl() and ptrace interfaces

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@kernel.org]

Hello:

This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>:

On Fri,  3 Apr 2026 19:40:56 -0600 you wrote:
> Restructure the per-task CFI indirect branch landing pad prctl()
> interface, as suggested by Linus [1].  In place of the current
> approach, which follows the style of shadow stack control prctl()s
> (PR_{GET,SET,LOCK}_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS), adopt the style of the
> speculation control prctl() constants (PR_{GET,SET}_SPECULATION_CTRL).
> 
> Then, to improve readability, expand "indir_br_lp", "lpad", and
> related abbreviations in the interfaces, also as requested by Linus.
> While here, expand "ss" in the shadow stack ptrace macros to "shadow
> stack".
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/6] riscv: ptrace: cfi: fix "PRACE" typo in uapi header
    (no matching commit)
  - [2/6] riscv: cfi: clear CFI lock status in start_thread()
    (no matching commit)
  - [3/6] riscv: ptrace: expand "LP" references to "branch landing pads" in uapi headers
    (no matching commit)
  - [4/6] prctl: rename branch landing pad implementation functions to be more explicit
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/987bd38dee75
  - [5/6] riscv: ptrace: cfi: expand "SS" references to "shadow stack" in uapi headers
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c8acc707f48c
  - [6/6] prctl: cfi: change the branch landing pad prctl()s to be more descriptive
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/e0d96d3c63f5

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv