Re: [PATCH 02/11] of: reserved_mem: reject reserved memory outside physical address range

[Wandun <chenwandun1@gmail.com>]

On 5/6/26 09:51, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 02:58:22PM +0800, Chen Wandun wrote:
>> early_init_dt_reserve_memory() does not validate whether the region
>> falls within physical memory. If a device tree incorrectly specifies a
>> reserved memory region outside the physical address range:
>>
>>   - For the non-nomap path, memblock_reserve() blindly adds the region
>>     to memblock.reserved, creating a stale entry that refers to
>>     non-existent memory.
>>
>>   - For the nomap path, memblock_mark_nomap() silently fails to match
>>     any region in memblock.memory, but still returns success.
>>
>> Add a memblock_overlaps_region() check at the entry of
>> early_init_dt_reserve_memory() to reject such regions before any
>> memblock operation takes place. This also simplifies the existing nomap
>> guard: the original "overlaps && is_reserved" condition reduces to just
>> "is_reserved", since the overlap with physical memory is already
>> guaranteed by the new check.
> While I agree, I suspect we already have cases abusing reserved-memory
> like this.
Sashiko reviewed this patch and told me:
"Historically, the reserved-memory binding is often used to describe 
hardware
SRAM, DSP memory, or IOMEM carveouts that reside outside of system RAM."
IIUC, nowdays using mmio-sram DT binding is more appropriate for SRAM or 
IOMEM carveouts.
Should I drop this patch or keep it ?
Thanks.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
>> Tested-by: Zhao Meijing <zhaomeijing@lixiang.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> index 9d1b0193864c..03c676052dab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
>> @@ -112,14 +112,21 @@ static int fdt_fixup_reserved_mem_node(unsigned long node,
>>   static int __init early_init_dt_reserve_memory(phys_addr_t base,
>>   					       phys_addr_t size, bool nomap)
>>   {
>> +	if (!memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory, base, size)) {
>> +		phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>> +
>> +		pr_warn("Reserved memory region %pa..%pa is outside of physical memory\n",
>> +			&base, &end);
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	if (nomap) {
>>   		/*
>>   		 * If the memory is already reserved (by another region), we
>> -		 * should not allow it to be marked nomap, but don't worry
>> -		 * if the region isn't memory as it won't be mapped.
>> +		 * should not allow it to be marked nomap. The region being
>> +		 * physical memory is guaranteed by the overlap check above.
>>   		 */
>> -		if (memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory, base, size) &&
>> -		    memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
>> +		if (memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
>>   			return -EBUSY;
>>   
>>   		return memblock_mark_nomap(base, size);
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv