From: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: "Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Fix crash when MSI domain is missing
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:57:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bce34c6-c2d0-4b2b-a8f9-7bc8737702b1@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9=C2UyfmHqtYYK-WeSRk3=6bjs5nzDmw9ntudbCnPOYxLtXg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Anup,
On 2024-11-15 9:42 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 1:31 AM Samuel Holland
> <samuel.holland@sifive.com> wrote:
>>
>> If the APLIC driver is probed before the IMSIC driver, the parent MSI
>> domain will be missing, which causes a NULL pointer dereference in
>> msi_create_device_irq_domain(). Avoid this by deferring probe until the
>> parent MSI domain is available. Use dev_err_probe() to avoid printing an
>> error message when returning -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> The -EPROBE_DEFER is not needed because we expect that platforms to
> use "msi-parent" DT property in APLIC DT node which in-turn allows Linux
> DD framework to re-order probing based on fw_devlink dependencies. The
> APLIC DT bindings mandates that any of "interrupt-extended" or "msi-parent"
> DT properties MUST be present.
>
> Can you elaborate a bit more on how you are hitting this issue ?
I agree that fw_devlink should help avoid the situation where we need to return
-EPROBE_DEFER, but the kernel must still not crash even if fw_devlink is
disabled (which is a perfectly valid thing to do: "fw_devlink=off" on the kernel
command line) or if fw_devlink fails to come up with the ideal probe order.
fw_devlink is an optimization. It should not be relied on for correctness. In my
specific case, fw_devlink got the order wrong due to some false dependency
cycles, which I sent a patch for separately[1].
Regards,
Samuel
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241114195652.3068725-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com/
>> Fixes: ca8df97fe679 ("irqchip/riscv-aplic: Add support for MSI-mode")
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
>> index 900e72541db9..93e7c51f944a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-main.c
>> @@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static int aplic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> else
>> rc = aplic_direct_setup(dev, regs);
>> if (rc)
>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n", msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct");
>> + dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "failed to setup APLIC in %s mode\n",
>> + msi_mode ? "MSI" : "direct");
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> if (!acpi_disabled)
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c
>> index 945bff28265c..fb8d1838609f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-aplic-msi.c
>> @@ -266,6 +266,9 @@ int aplic_msi_setup(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs)
>> if (msi_domain)
>> dev_set_msi_domain(dev, msi_domain);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (!dev_get_msi_domain(dev))
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> }
>>
>> if (!msi_create_device_irq_domain(dev, MSI_DEFAULT_DOMAIN, &aplic_msi_template,
>> --
>> 2.45.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 20:01 [PATCH] irqchip/riscv-aplic: Fix crash when MSI domain is missing Samuel Holland
2024-11-15 15:42 ` Anup Patel
2024-11-15 15:57 ` Samuel Holland [this message]
2024-11-18 8:19 ` Anup Patel
2024-12-11 22:33 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bce34c6-c2d0-4b2b-a8f9-7bc8737702b1@sifive.com \
--to=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox