From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 455E7C433EF for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=X6ZX0Iq1heBb4b3uurnHia4HL91Syd2MRqq6mK4r+mw=; b=sbNnA8N8s5PkIc hRoUtQ/GY5ZYVtGVcYkKkhiZo0JWiGk4h+b/G/yipQNUdKmRcnaeqYUHw/UXeQPcdOniHLOfGD8SP DHgw6gbCkpyt52oYMXLNJy5ONn0c+cq7WYrM+g9KWbmiapHf+t7nPOOQizZJCFZektMl60WZ/Eatp R3dZQpxU+QZk9qOPRgnDiqjlrqJv6z+/3RNFmve3uofqXva9YlONpIPweq2FuXlOKseZwZTjG5aF9 riG5UDz14PbvgkchZr7cD3I66nIFqA5Cdn9wohH2V1pstLiq5d7TYM2GcKsl4fOF+hAYoptmonsH/ /5+BFzC1Cp0MuWDhUfDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o6u7W-00HHF6-Kw; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:10 +0000 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o6u7P-00HHDF-Mz for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25UCCQiF021464; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=Gz5rGKtpdQID8m6HmioTidsQ2SmRszmdxDHeu0i98ho=; b=HM0UuS4YYa1vixPvyBe6Vu9a1Fk+BHF5GC5p408SmUkVNQUx/0CWBhnTeY9r+mNmZB7N aEn0D4mbmhY/x7+iuEhnrOpwV0lMyoh99jVMDa43azLF9rbjwbRo4RV4EwJ+eu3DizsP DLWb5AK/JGrvMh1EgKuDzlYr46jCUTRap0mksaQGANInXC0BNvF0RBSQCGGqajsGM8xR Neww2acpfbyLrcRLXFvWt7o60N/O0yZy2dvLcwVSt2AITyBlHtxMTyCSRBE8WR9cl+KF dZZDnzyJcp5tyQ/gx7UkCZQDn2LAF3M2aFNnOUCVIa86Gw5ZIQ9xGTzbHCJEvQj57feW AQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h1bmmt7e7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:03 +0000 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25UCGTHS037328; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:02 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h1bmmt7d5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:02 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25UDLJOo013809; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:00 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gwt09056p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:22:00 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25UDLw6923855568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:21:58 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F6011C04A; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:21:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A98611C050; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:21:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.82.30]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:21:56 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1c9924ca8c93182d8673064cd02262b75857fe67.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support kexec_file on 32-bit RISC-V From: Mimi Zohar To: Palmer Dabbelt , dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:21:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20220624044811.9682-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> References: <20220624044811.9682-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Ff9ylWNk9uhWoXrVL2dO4Uh6CLqcKXp_ X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: d06SwYGMN-EpKPgDWtITZ5KlqDrEIo08 X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-30_09,2022-06-28_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=928 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206300052 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220630_062203_806507_CE6C0116 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.77 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Palmer, On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 21:48 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > This rolled itself back to the top of my inbox, so I figured I'd send it > again as Rob's review landed. IMO the security/integrity/ima/ change is > sufficiently trivial that it's fine to take it through the RISC-V tree > but I don't have an Review/Ack so I'll wait until this loops back again > to give the security/integrity/ folks a chance to chime in. > > If this loops back to the top of my queue (which looks about a month > deep right now) without any comments then I'll put it in riscv/for-next. > > Thanks! > > Changes since v1 > > * Collected reviews for drivers/of/kexec.c. Maybe better that you upstream the RISC-V changes. So far there aren't any merge conflicts with this patchset, but a number of other kexec patch sets will hopefully be upstreamed in the coming open window. I'd appreciate if you could create a topic branch for the first two patches. thanks, Mimi _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv