From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:11:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180910161143.GA1053@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809101805110.1419@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:07:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Considering above, it is better to have a distinct irqchip and
> > irq_domain for all local interrupts (just like this patch).
>
> If that's the future usage
It's not, at least there has been no proposal for that so far, and I
don't really think it is how the architecture was intended.
> and that's what my impression was, under which I
> changed my mind, yes, then having a domain model is certainly of advantage
> especially when those things end up being different per SoC.
And even if we went down the way of using the other bits it would
be architectureal in the RISC-V spec - these are not available for
vendor specific uses.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-06 12:36 [PATCH v2 0/5] New RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver Anup Patel
2018-09-06 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] RISC-V: self-contained IPI handling routine Anup Patel
2018-09-06 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] RISC-V: No need to pass scause as arg to do_IRQ() Anup Patel
2018-09-06 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] irqchip: RISC-V Local Interrupt Controller Driver Anup Patel
2018-09-06 14:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-06 14:19 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-08 10:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 13:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 13:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 13:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 14:29 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-10 16:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-09-10 16:35 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-10 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 17:11 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-10 19:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-10 22:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-11 3:57 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-11 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 22:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 16:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 16:32 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-10 16:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 16:38 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-17 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-17 14:28 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-26 5:54 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-26 5:54 ` Anup Patel
2018-09-26 15:38 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-09-26 15:38 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-09-06 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clocksource: riscv_timer: Make timer interrupt as a per-CPU interrupt Anup Patel
2018-09-06 12:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] RISC-V: Remove do_IRQ() function Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180910161143.GA1053@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).