Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip: sifive-plic: Implement irq_set_affinity() for SMP host

Atish Patra
2018-11-30T07:54:33Z

On 11/29/18 9:59 PM, Atish Patra wrote:
> On 11/27/18 2:04 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
>> Currently on SMP host, all CPUs take external interrupts routed via
>> PLIC. All CPUs will try to claim a given external interrupt but only
>> one of them will succeed while other CPUs would simply resume whatever
>> they were doing before. This means if we have N CPUs then for every
>> external interrupt N-1 CPUs will always fail to claim it and waste
>> their CPU time.
>>
>> Instead of above, external interrupts should be taken by only one CPU
>> and we should have provision to explicity specify IRQ affinity from
> s/explicity/explicitly
>
>> kernel-space or user-space.
>>
>> This patch provides irq_set_affinity() implementation for PLIC driver.
>> It also updates irq_enable() such that PLIC interrupts are only enabled
>> for one of CPUs specified in IRQ affinity mask.
>>
>> With this patch in-place, we can change IRQ affinity at any-time from
>> user-space using procfs.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> / # cat /proc/interrupts
>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
>> 8: 44 0 0 0 SiFive PLIC 8 virtio0
>> 10: 48 0 0 0 SiFive PLIC 10 ttyS0
>> IPI0: 55 663 58 363 Rescheduling interrupts
>> IPI1: 0 1 3 16 Function call interrupts
>> / #
>> / #
>> / # echo 4 > /proc/irq/10/smp_affinity
>> / #
>> / # cat /proc/interrupts
>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
>> 8: 45 0 0 0 SiFive PLIC 8 virtio0
>> 10: 160 0 17 0 SiFive PLIC 10 ttyS0
>> IPI0: 68 693 77 410 Rescheduling interrupts
>> IPI1: 0 2 3 16 Function call interrupts
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
>> index ffd4deaca057..fec7da3797fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
>> @@ -98,14 +98,42 @@ static void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask, int hwirq, int enable)
>>
>> static void plic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> - plic_irq_toggle(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), d->hwirq, 1);
>> + unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d),
>> + cpu_online_mask);
>> + WARN_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);
>> + plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1);
>> }
>>
>> static void plic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
>> {
>> - plic_irq_toggle(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), d->hwirq, 0);
>> + plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
>> + bool force)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int cpu;
>> +
>> + if (!force)
>> + cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
>> + else
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
>> +
>> + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!irqd_irq_disabled(d)) {
>> + plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0);
>> + plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1);
>
> irq is disabled for a fraction of time for cpu as well.
> You can use cpumask_andnot to avoid that.
>
>
> Moreover, something is weird here. I tested the patch in Unleashed with
> a debug statement.
>
> Here are the cpumask plic_set_affinity receives.
>
> # echo 0 > /proc[ 280.810000] plic: plic_set_affinity: set affinity [0-1]
> [ 280.810000] plic: plic_set_affinity: cpu = [0] irq = 4
> # echo 1 > /proc[ 286.290000] plic: plic_set_affinity: set affinity [0]
> [ 286.290000] plic: plic_set_affinity: cpu = [0] irq = 4
> # echo 2 > /proc[ 292.130000] plic: plic_set_affinity: set affinity [1]
> [ 292.130000] plic: plic_set_affinity: cpu = [1] irq = 4
> # echo 3 > /proc[ 297.750000] plic: plic_set_affinity: set affinity [0-1]
> [ 297.750000] plic: plic_set_affinity: cpu = [0] irq = 4
>
> # echo 2 > /proc/irq/4/smp_affinity
> [ 322.850000] plic: plic_set_affinity: set affinity [1]
> [ 322.850000] plic: plic_set_affinity: cpu = [1] irq = 4
>
> I have not figured out why it receive cpu mask for 0 & 3.
> Not sure if logical cpu id to hart id mapping is responsible for other
> two case. I will continue to test tomorrow.
>

Never mind.
The input is in hex which explains the cpumask which explains all three
cases except 0.
If we pass zero, it just passing the previous affinity mask.

Regards,
Atish
> Regards,
> Atish
>> + }
>> +
>
>> + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
>> +
>> + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
>> .name = "SiFive PLIC",
>> /*
>> @@ -114,6 +142,9 @@ static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
>> */
>> .irq_enable = plic_irq_enable,
>> .irq_disable = plic_irq_disable,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> + .irq_set_affinity = plic_set_affinity,
>> +#endif
>> };
>>
>> static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>>
>
>