From: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
nickhu@andestech.com
Subject: Re: Perf counters on SiFive FU540-C000
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:27:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403092758.GA26612@andestech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403084237.qygtfnefppdr3vtj@aurora.visucore.com>
Hi Wladimir,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks Alan and Palmer for the input!
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:04:26AM +0800, Alan Kao wrote:
>
> > > >These are very basic: CSRs mhpmevent3 and mhpmevent4 can be used to choose a category
> > > >(Instruction Commit Events, Microarchitectural Events, Memory System Events), then
> > > >from these categories a bitmask of events can be set that will increase the associated
> > > >counter when they happen. I don't understand the rationale for counting multiple
> > > >kinds of events in one register, so from what I understand, two counters can be
> > > >supported at once in the perf interface.
> > >
> > > The idea here is to allow users to have different performance counter
> > > granularities. For example, users might want to count all pipeline flushes
> > > (maybe their framework defines that as a possible counter type) or may want
> > > to specifically indicate which sort of pipeline flush should be counted.
>
> I didn't realize some of them were conceptually hierarchical, seen in that light
> it makes a lot of sense and it's a good way of being able to count at various levels.
>
> > > >I found some documentation about platform specfic counters in Documentation/riscv/pmu.txt,
> > > >hopefully this is enough to get me started.
> > > >(If someone started work on this, please let me know)
> > >
> > > Someone from Andes had patches out to add support for their performance
> > > counters a while ago. The issue there was that the performance counter
> > > implementation was chosen at compile time, but it should really be detected
> > > at run time via some platform-specific mechanism (ie, device tree).
> >
> > PMU detection was one of the problems, and should have been solved in previous
> > patches. For the rest of the problems, Documentation/riscv/pmu.txt should
> > serve as a good guide.
>
> Looking at the device tree (for 'sifive,fu540g' compatibility?) seems, to me,
> to be the right answer here.
Ideally there should be a PMU node in the DTS. I don't have the DTS for FU540
so you have to check if something alike exists.
>
> It'd be possible to really-detect by configuring a specific event type then
> running that instruction and looking at the counters, but that seems
> unnecessary.
>
Sure. beleiving-reading-parsing the DTS you got is the norm.
> > > Aside from that I think the only issue was how to expose these to userspace
> > > in a sane fashion, which is something I thought would be quite tricky. IIRC
> > > someone managed to convince me that there was a really simple scheme for
> > > doing this, but I don't remember what it was.
> >
> > The corresponding userspace tool is in tools/perf. Once one finishes the kernel
> > part, the work left for userspace perf will be the symbolization of PMU raw
> > events. The preliminary patch supports common counters only, so I believe this
> > will be the first platform-specific PMU in RISC-V.
>
> Right-the user-space interface would be 'perf', the idea would be to make that
> work for all the counters so that 'perf top' and profiling work for them.
>
Oops ... current spec gives you no interrupt when a counter overflows, so
basically you cannot do the profiling by perf even if you finish the event
mapping. The best you can get is "perf stat" to work.
> So it seems to me that on the kernel side, apart from the setup and allocation
> logic, that these platform-specific counters can be handled in the same way as
> `mcycle` and `minstret` are, they're also simple counters without overrun
> notification logic or other fancy features.
>
> Also with the same limitation that they cannot be written to from the kernel
> in S-mode, so need to keep track of deltas.
>
> Speaking of which, can the kernel write to the selectors? Oh crap I guess not.
Unfortunately you are right. You have to manually hack some SBIs for writing
event masks.
>
> Wladimir
Alan
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-31 14:37 Perf counters on SiFive FU540-C000 Wladimir J. van der Laan
2019-04-02 17:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-04-03 1:04 ` Alan Kao
2019-04-03 8:42 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2019-04-03 9:27 ` Alan Kao [this message]
2019-04-03 9:58 ` Wladimir J. van der Laan
2019-04-03 22:15 ` Palmer Dabbelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190403092758.GA26612@andestech.com \
--to=alankao@andestech.com \
--cc=laanwj@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nickhu@andestech.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).