From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2865AC4360F for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 05:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB32E217D4 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 05:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ORnNaoDn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB32E217D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=AOGw4+jxF3bgjB0uf6gIaC7jXTa80XcXj+nCp+hFQlE=; b=ORnNaoDnqkzAiK XPxXr+c7hiFla1FhmazceRbTOVzQu8CymMtBO2khr+Fke9wWaWsKeYlIOgAi3/JSVX4W+P79ppHEd lTa2EV8735iJh830Qgk6ag/zWGM8JStp9t6TX7QM7uxqBR9SIRFcaXW3wYn6KDMrURxNJZy3d457j IPmUWxA55srMixP8pYjsjAjl022NjuoR0RcJJx/5AOp+dbO0feR6nItR3Pwromdc3810xK2cDuCAF 7W4rMNwOqBLytQrLB5Xn5wlZ4uuUuobmpA+4F/AlgY+ifQKi55oT70LSU2xq7kbcNcSTbyKdx7Jj0 u0SFhPmPIrBqU6lcBFqQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hCHo0-0001wq-0P; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 05:54:24 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hCHnx-0001w0-Ii; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 05:54:21 +0000 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 22:54:21 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Anup Patel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Fix Maximum Physical Memory 2GiB option for 64bit systems Message-ID: <20190405055421.GA7087@infradead.org> References: <20190405054909.3238-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190405054909.3238-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mike Rapoport , Christoph Hellwig , Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:49:34AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote: > The Maximum Physical Memory 2GiB option for 64bit systems is currently > broken because kernel hangs at boot-time when this option is enabled > and the underlying system has more than 2GiB memory. > > This issue can be easily reproduced on SiFive Unleashed board where > we have 8GiB of memory. > > This patch fixes above issue by removing unusable memory region in > setup_bootmem(). > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Btw, what is the rationale behind even offering the 2GiB option and the medlow model on 64-bit? Do we reall have use cases where the slightly more effient generated code matters so much to keep up the support burden of this mostly unused and unusual configuration? _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv