From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5E1C43331 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5386020714 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="bG+Tx+k5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5386020714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To :Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eBZKaDN5ELZmde4eDCl0fiv27Rw87Ga/FhWYBmPsTY4=; b=bG+Tx+k5EXBIuYAHsP6fwx/c6 GWl7mruEh+OQVKq+DPHMUI3sjaAbnrrmjP6MnNqmwEav+9KSm4uKuYpxklC6f0KOQgz9GiFNnYRpV QRhQeKlAftPPwVNcleP7qfH94Cxu199PAXU4I43c/1ZYzuYW1KHcujslgoomHivk4ni6BxTNHXbDJ SP9t2fwxlfvySryoxSKAmieBWYyLGZecZuBP37An9x8tpBO/2E35WY2zgzsKUTJBWr2ZnFGryJCJ/ 59z9u9cQ9zojYvmYKORr2X4tQ7vVSI8r91tnKgg0IY9QDft070mH6GP94qGkB9KSbfEgQ9UTUkEig dyxczUpLw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJ1W8-0006Ru-6y; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:00:20 +0000 Received: from alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.39]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJ1W4-0006Qx-8T for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:00:19 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.142]) by alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2020 14:00:15 -0700 Received: from gurus-linux.qualcomm.com ([10.46.162.81]) by ironmsg02-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2020 14:00:12 -0700 Received: by gurus-linux.qualcomm.com (Postfix, from userid 383780) id 695C14BFF; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:00:12 -0700 From: Guru Das Srinagesh To: Daniel Thompson Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Message-ID: <20200330210012.GA27611@codeaurora.org> References: <20200321114703.GB4672@kadam> <20200330191506.GA29534@codeaurora.org> <20200330202636.njjo4savgzf3g6yx@holly.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200330202636.njjo4savgzf3g6yx@holly.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200330_140016_338816_52166F90 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kate Stewart , Daniel Vetter , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie , "Wesley W. Terpstra" , Michael Turquette , Joonas Lahtinen , Kamil Debski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Liam Girdwood , Atish Patra , Thierry Reding , Benjamin Gaignard , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Lee Jones , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= , Alexandre Torgue , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Axel Lin , Arnd Bergmann , Alexander Shiyan , Fabio Estevam , Chen-Yu Tsai , NXP Linux Team , Mukesh Ojha , Gerald Baeza , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Dan Carpenter , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Philipp Zabel , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Sascha Hauer , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Rodrigo Vivi , Mark Brown , Jani Nikula , Paul Walmsley , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Thomas Gleixner , Fabrice Gasnier , Ding Xiang , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Allison Randal , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wilson , Anson Huang , Richard Fontana , Stephen Boyd , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah , Palmer Dabbelt , Guenter Roeck , Maxime Coquelin , Shawn Guo Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:15:07PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:47:03PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > This is a giant CC list. > > > > Yes, this is because I received feedback [1] on an earlier patchset > > directing me to add the reviewers of patches to the cover letter as > > well so that they get some context for the patch. > > ... > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11735.html > > Strictly speaking I only asked for backlight maintainers to be Cc:ed. > I was fairly careful to be specific since I'm aware there are a variety > of differing habits when putting together the Cc: list for covering > letters. > > With the original patch header the purpose of the patch I was Cc:ed on > was impossible to determine without the covering letter. I suspect this might be the case for all the other reviewers as well - that they also would appreciate context for the specific patch they are being added to review. I wasn't entirely sure what the convention was, so I applied your suggestion to all the files. How do you suggest I handle this in my next patchset? I fully agree that such a large CC list does look really ungainly. Thank you. Guru Das.