From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A02C55186 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7332076E for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="PiP/uUwb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5B7332076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To :Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=fVNiplVe58sJkPzhqy8WRRNgSyhr6jgvEDfpNk4rCCM=; b=PiP/uUwb4F8qtVeiO2QaoyyFX MUQnRRTzSTPL4t4aetNeKazJetfIaPru8QJdbzHDMKGxtIzco4DkZW8drs11figtHK/Ll9BZsiuo7 6Uhs7r9xzm72dc70DWENji73aTOwUMkEBaumaiyyPNwdYn+Bj3Y6EGUgT7X/I5HsXtLA3h6lCbwmc fsVtm0NBafsJ5eXqX4Vr0W8sX5JWm2xUM+CwhdhWSl6Cd2aXm14xHK4O1UpLmCtrZGzLEI+R5TPc9 KEdYkDtEqDA6ct1Ir7K96okQCnRsiCaJVHva9pFNfDZmfrbTQalJDkuCDbnL59b69NfHDla8//yc9 HL5zCZNtA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jROwN-00014D-BW; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:38:03 +0000 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.38]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jROwK-000131-Ha for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:38:02 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg03-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.143]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2020 16:37:56 -0700 Received: from gurus-linux.qualcomm.com ([10.46.162.81]) by ironmsg03-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2020 16:37:55 -0700 Received: by gurus-linux.qualcomm.com (Postfix, from userid 383780) id 38ACE4C87; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:37:55 -0700 From: Guru Das Srinagesh To: Daniel Thompson Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/11] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Message-ID: <20200422233755.GA11597@codeaurora.org> References: <20200422084934.ajh6yzs5mkzzvop4@holly.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200422084934.ajh6yzs5mkzzvop4@holly.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200422_163800_672686_F595D9CE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kate Stewart , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, David Collins , Liam Girdwood , David Airlie , Michael Turquette , Joonas Lahtinen , Kamil Debski , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Chris Wilson , Atish Patra , Thierry Reding , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Fabio Estevam , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Alexander Shiyan , Lee Jones , Chen-Yu Tsai , NXP Linux Team , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Philipp Zabel , Sascha Hauer , Guenter Roeck , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare , Alexandre Torgue , Arnd Bergmann , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Maxime Ripard , Mark Brown , Paul Walmsley , Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , Thomas Gleixner , Fabrice Gasnier , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Allison Randal , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Coquelin , Richard Fontana , Stephen Boyd , Jingoo Han , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah , Palmer Dabbelt , Dan Carpenter , Daniel Vetter , Joe Perches , Shawn Guo Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:57:12PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote: > > [REQUEST] > > > > Would it be possible for the patches that have already received Acked-by's in > > this series to be accepted and applied to the tree? I lost an Acked-by (in > > intel-panel.c) because it had a merge conflict with a new change that came in > > after I rebased to tip. I wasn't sure earlier about accepting single patches as > > opposed to the entire series en masse, but this event has got me thinking. > > Has there been a positive maintainer review of patch 11 at any point in > the thread (most of the people you are asking to commit patches have > not been able to see the discussion about the actual feature these > patches are preparing for)? Yes. Uwe had this to say [1] about a previous patchset (v5) of patch 11 which is essentially unchanged in this patchset save the dropping of the pwm_capture change. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pwm/msg11536.html Thank you. Guru Das.