From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C324C47254 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478E420735 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="bBO1yemA"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Pqbqjcp4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 478E420735 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ckZTDK9kcamEMmc1gATLi1RBCBlss05gWVQweLLzqLk=; b=bBO1yemAwPCeiD boF/8Yx8b/YwUz/Y1pGdRp2dTvL6gwK2m93zvmGRnkbZ9IhadSeNAaUmqTdbVb+yhmCF2bz4F4OvO wySmjsyxq7htgmFU64G81OPyEd+bLbpAUjEt00W1BSs73eTlQkXQTP7TtJO7FWI27ZqzliN9fR/v7 0g3qfWCXuc+e/MWrfQKq87DhaQot/BfjoMe0GkXRaoWdG3/NuyL1J5aPSwQBF2SVvDMVr3o9HqsWP YIjhkQdvzUzjeQXXALHKuN0uhzcpgumDk4MskOPiaqz2o6tDHcJ0togDxVKp6PGSzFRgJex5W+XVT CnaAV24S9KoDTNLcBIKQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jW3vN-0003YY-N1; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:12:17 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jW3vF-0003Pj-Gg; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:12:10 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 619D920721; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:12:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588709528; bh=iCXbhk1z7F/kDs/nVraqaeYgCyIHXWPhAh8/VhmA1Xc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Pqbqjcp4PnFOmgqIDXj+8Bjl6/5/ohqBUkYxBuWzwlincpqWy3FQ0xkMGyVHwccvX WM2WCc/TBYfgYOWauIGtOhNuO3kK/yFKTFM/3sVIa4qR6GQIMPYaJ7YCqa0w6CoXwz sir6b1/N/Bs7N2CIGHNBpBp9fd/ysavQ6VdHSk/Y= Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 13:12:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Anshuman Khandual Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/hugetlb: Introduce HAVE_ARCH_CLEAR_HUGEPAGE_FLAGS Message-Id: <20200505131206.bee7b103431bff077c2ca0cf@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <21460cbc-8e9a-b956-5797-57b2e1df9fb1@arm.com> References: <1586864670-21799-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1586864670-21799-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <20200425175511.7a68efb5e2f4436fe0328c1d@linux-foundation.org> <87d37591-caa2-b82b-392a-3a29b2c7e9a6@arm.com> <20200425200124.20d0c75fcaef05d062d3667c@linux-foundation.org> <21460cbc-8e9a-b956-5797-57b2e1df9fb1@arm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200505_131209_572223_4B962DDD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato , Michael Ellerman , Helge Deller , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Fenghua Yu , Vasily Gorbik , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Borislav Petkov , Paul Walmsley , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tony Luck , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , Mike Kravetz Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 5 May 2020 08:21:34 +0530 Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>> static inline void arch_clear_hugepage_flags(struct page *page) > >>> { > >>> > >>> } > >>> #define arch_clear_hugepage_flags arch_clear_hugepage_flags > >>> > >>> It's a small difference - mainly to avoid adding two variables to the > >>> overall namespace where one would do. > >> > >> Understood, will change and resend. > > > > That's OK - I've queued up that fix. > > > > Hello Andrew, > > I might not have searched all the relevant trees or might have just searched > earlier than required. But I dont see these patches (or your proposed fixes) > either in mmotm (2020-04-29-23-04) or in next-20200504. Wondering if you are > waiting on a V2 for this series accommodating the changes you had proposed. hm. I think I must have got confused and thought you were referring to a different patch. Yes please, let's have v2.