From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4610CC433E1 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F592245C for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kS+lZ76V"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DFoey0bO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 09F592245C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=v30RG8qRcFzAN34PnmWWW6VgZpKmPHO8ptO4RQu+IpY=; b=kS+lZ76V3C+HTpM5jXtbGRjMs 4ZFMLk4sd/t9VmNzEg0anaYddG+OznMGEkEBIPsNwUkNzGXzhMDiWON2heI9hP1dFu5Uyi3Rl4Sz+ MYWg7hspa/lacTCd1c1s7sO9/o4Yo1wp/JuWkynoQ+MYBL9XxE2sTALXfTsmz7A+5GvkoTNecvOdu But+8TFaT+XXiMjNCHid9t3LAQdkTq+qHMiD/aQA4RuHWEkrdeEz1MCT+nAzg3bnxq96gxqE53SER fES6sEj4icMxwsotGhLVXKepdQPa7xPUC51Hw3RdkBD5oelIXTjCfOB4XGGh5NxP2Zum0t4bVYo8A KwWt2Jmtw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3Mqi-0006mF-Gt; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:05:08 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81] helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3Mqf-0006lE-J4 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:05:07 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596647104; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aqjcjFj0cLfrtaKdyRnzSHGUtnIcD/6QjX80vbdnnDs=; b=DFoey0bO6w7ZCt8Lg+nIYUyo0aGbPoqmgOjySZ3QP6IegNTWwAL+A73U/sE9pP0xpqLrYg pjWQgL8+iiCRtROab1pv2TAojdUHe7i9p9eWkEZUEUSkbp/HKozUk3L5U+xvNID06Zn6IW FAPZ2RNi4EzqopFrwRAMbAuN7ohn9SA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-48-v1Ut0-vMMlKQmdlxYzNI4g-1; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 13:03:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: v1Ut0-vMMlKQmdlxYzNI4g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA368F53CF; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elisabeth (unknown [10.36.110.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488217B910; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 19:02:34 +0200 From: Stefano Brivio To: Naresh Kamboju Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tunnels: PMTU discovery support for directly bridged IP packets Message-ID: <20200805190234.1d95dccd@elisabeth> In-Reply-To: References: <83e5876f589b0071638630dd93fbe0fa6b1b257c.1596520062.git.sbrivio@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200805_130505_919462_1420493D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stephen Rothwell , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, Nikolay Aleksandrov , Netdev , Aaron Conole , paul.walmsley@sifive.com, Florian Westphal , open list , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Pravin B Shelar , Linux-Next Mailing List , Roopa Prabhu , Numan Siddique , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Lourdes Pedrajas , "David S. Miller" , palmer@dabbelt.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Naresh, On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 22:24:03 +0530 Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 11:24, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > > + icmp6h->icmp6_cksum = csum_ipv6_magic(&nip6h->saddr, &nip6h->daddr, len, > > + IPPROTO_ICMPV6, csum); > > Linux next build breaks for riscv architecture defconfig build. Yes, sorry for that. Stephen Rothwell already reported this for s390 defconfig and I sent a patch some hours ago: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/a85e9878716c2904488d56335320b7131613e94c.1596633316.git.sbrivio@redhat.com/ Thanks for reporting this though! -- Stefano _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv