From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E2EC433E1 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F0E22B40 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Tv5mUl9C" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 42F0E22B40 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=azFSPyFlDHQUOOqLSKqq84WMTiO8m6lwFurVQDv/TTU=; b=Tv5mUl9CCDAeUD8cqMt5FzObi 9468I5TydEDJrB/+kjeBoP79sz0Ed5+HKEpEtx4H3Ew4zBOVC9Q6l8e0JBO4zb12TWvymIZSITMLU SMESQzpCovbRDizRcD90i+enYtsZj+5mxWfQPrVf7IZdSEiWdfSUI3vzLFvhH+xSS1XmUDPTEdOUv 1vAMn8ZmN9kLvT03kb2EPdedBI1Q9PtVh4ywOr8wPsIsblXTf64kRUnt3aKczaPHGsGg1YA6YpOzj n962i1XeOy9GblxOAgshBS8tIZu889AeiCeYGl68gijYANILRg0Yj6CYh/160cCeUY2GGc3C9cSJW 242OnOCTA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kB0Y9-0007eu-57; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:53:33 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kB0Y6-0007eY-N7 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:53:31 +0000 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A8DA2078A; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 14:53:27 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Fixup lockdep assert held of text_mutex Message-ID: <20200826145327.7530b2e5@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20200813113743.001b6c31@oasis.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200826_145330_844692_FDEAB5F2 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guoren@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, guoren@kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > I pointed out in the patch notes that it seems reasonable to have the generic > code handle this case, would you be opposed to doing it that way? For now, lets hold off and see if other archs start to do it the same way. Then we should look into making it more generic. It's an easy enough fix per arch, so there's no urgency to this. -- Steve _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv