Re: [PATCH net-next 16/22] riscv: dts: microchip: add mpfs's CAN controllers

Re: [PATCH net-next 16/22] riscv: dts: microchip: add mpfs's CAN controllers

[Conor.Dooley]

On 27/06/2022 08:30, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> On 27.06.2022 07:12:47, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 25/06/2022 13:03, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> PolarFire SoC has a pair of CAN controllers, but as they were
>>> undocumented there were omitted from the device tree. Add them.
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607065459.2035746-3-conor.dooley@microchip.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>>
>> Hey Marc,
>> Not entirely familiar with the process here.
>> Do I apply this patch when the rest of the series gets taken,
>> or will this patch go through the net tree?
>
> Both patches:
>
>  38a71fc04895 riscv: dts: microchip: add mpfs's CAN controllers
>  c878d518d7b6 dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller
>
> are on they way to mainline via the net-next tree. No further actions
> needed on your side.

dts through the netdev tree rater than via the arch? Seems a little odd,
but it'd be via my tree anyway and I don't mind & unless Palmer objects:
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH net-next 16/22] riscv: dts: microchip: add mpfs's CAN controllers

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1912 bytes --]

On 27.06.2022 11:17:39, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 27/06/2022 08:30, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > On 27.06.2022 07:12:47, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> >> On 25/06/2022 13:03, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>>
> >>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >>>
> >>> PolarFire SoC has a pair of CAN controllers, but as they were
> >>> undocumented there were omitted from the device tree. Add them.
> >>>
> >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607065459.2035746-3-conor.dooley@microchip.com
> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
> >>
> >> Hey Marc,
> >> Not entirely familiar with the process here.
> >> Do I apply this patch when the rest of the series gets taken,
> >> or will this patch go through the net tree?
> >
> > Both patches:
> >
> >  38a71fc04895 riscv: dts: microchip: add mpfs's CAN controllers
> >  c878d518d7b6 dt-bindings: can: mpfs: document the mpfs CAN controller
> >
> > are on they way to mainline via the net-next tree. No further actions
> > needed on your side.
> 
> dts through the netdev tree rater than via the arch? Seems a little odd,
> but it'd be via my tree anyway and I don't mind & unless Palmer objects:
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

It was just applied to net-next/master. Drop me a note if something
should be reverted.

regards,
Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv