[PATCH v6 05/21] cacheinfo: Add support to check if last level cache(LLC) is valid or shared

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	conor.dooley@microchip.com,
	valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
	Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/21] cacheinfo: Add support to check if last level cache(LLC) is valid or shared
Date: Mon,  4 Jul 2022 11:15:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704101605.1318280-6-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704101605.1318280-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

It is useful to have helper to check if the given two CPUs share last
level cache. We can do that check by comparing fw_token or by comparing
the cache ID. Currently we check just for fw_token as the cache ID is
optional.

This helper can be used to build the llc_sibling during arch specific
topology parsing and feeding information to the sched_domains. This also
helps to get rid of llc_id in the CPU topology as it is sort of duplicate
information.

Also add helper to check if the llc information in cacheinfo is valid
or not.

Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/cacheinfo.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
index 2cea9201f31c..fdc1baa342f1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -47,6 +47,32 @@ static inline bool cache_leaves_are_shared(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
 	return sib_leaf->fw_token == this_leaf->fw_token;
 }
 
+bool last_level_cache_is_valid(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct cacheinfo *llc;
+
+	if (!cache_leaves(cpu))
+		return false;
+
+	llc = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu, cache_leaves(cpu) - 1);
+
+	return !!llc->fw_token;
+}
+
+bool last_level_cache_is_shared(unsigned int cpu_x, unsigned int cpu_y)
+{
+	struct cacheinfo *llc_x, *llc_y;
+
+	if (!last_level_cache_is_valid(cpu_x) ||
+	    !last_level_cache_is_valid(cpu_y))
+		return false;
+
+	llc_x = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu_x, cache_leaves(cpu_x) - 1);
+	llc_y = per_cpu_cacheinfo_idx(cpu_y, cache_leaves(cpu_y) - 1);
+
+	return cache_leaves_are_shared(llc_x, llc_y);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 /* OF properties to query for a given cache type */
 struct cache_type_info {
diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
index 4ff37cb763ae..7e429bc5c1a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
+++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu);
 int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
 int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu);
 int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu);
+bool last_level_cache_is_valid(unsigned int cpu);
+bool last_level_cache_is_shared(unsigned int cpu_x, unsigned int cpu_y);
 #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT
 /*
  * acpi_find_last_cache_level is only called on ACPI enabled
-- 
2.37.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
