From: guoren@kernel.org
To: anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, heiko@sntech.de,
philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] riscv: asid: Fixup stale TLB entry cause application crash
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 00:40:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109054056.3618089-1-guoren@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
After use_asid_allocator is enabled, the userspace application will
crash by stale TLB entries. Because only using cpumask_clear_cpu without
local_flush_tlb_all couldn't guarantee CPU's TLB entries were fresh.
Then set_mm_asid would cause the user space application to get a stale
value by stale TLB entry, but set_mm_noasid is okay.
Here is the symptom of the bug:
unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 (coredump)
0x0000003fd6d22524 <+4>: auipc s0,0x70
0x0000003fd6d22528 <+8>: ld s0,-148(s0) # 0x3fd6d92490
=> 0x0000003fd6d2252c <+12>: ld a5,0(s0)
(gdb) i r s0
s0 0x8082ed1cc3198b21 0x8082ed1cc3198b21
(gdb) x /2x 0x3fd6d92490
0x3fd6d92490: 0xd80ac8a8 0x0000003f
The core dump file shows that register s0 is wrong, but the value in
memory is correct. Because 'ld s0, -148(s0)' used a stale mapping entry
in TLB and got a wrong result from an incorrect physical address.
When the task ran on CPU0, which loaded/speculative-loaded the value of
address(0x3fd6d92490), then the first version of the mapping entry was
PTWed into CPU0's TLB.
When the task switched from CPU0 to CPU1 (No local_tlb_flush_all here by
asid), it happened to write a value on the address (0x3fd6d92490). It
caused do_page_fault -> wp_page_copy -> ptep_clear_flush ->
ptep_get_and_clear & flush_tlb_page.
The flush_tlb_page used mm_cpumask(mm) to determine which CPUs need TLB
flush, but CPU0 had cleared the CPU0's mm_cpumask in the previous
switch_mm. So we only flushed the CPU1 TLB and set the second version
mapping of the PTE. When the task switched from CPU1 to CPU0 again, CPU0
still used a stale TLB mapping entry which contained a wrong target
physical address. It raised a bug when the task happened to read that
value.
The solution is to keep all CPUs' footmarks of cpumask(mm) in switch_mm,
which could prevent losing pieces of stuff during TLB flush.
Fixes: 65d4b9c53017 ("RISC-V: Implement ASID allocator")
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Fixup nommu compile problem (Thx Conor, Also Reported-by: kernel
test robot <lkp@intel.com>)
- Keep cpumask_clear_cpu for noasid
---
arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
index 7acbfbd14557..f58e4b211595 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
@@ -317,7 +317,11 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
*/
cpu = smp_processor_id();
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
+ if (!static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator))
+#endif
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
+
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
set_mm(next, cpu);
--
2.36.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 5:40 guoren [this message]
2022-11-09 9:45 ` [PATCH V2] riscv: asid: Fixup stale TLB entry cause application crash Andrew Jones
2022-11-10 1:51 ` Guo Ren
2022-11-10 9:22 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221109054056.3618089-1-guoren@kernel.org \
--to=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox