Re: [PATCH 5/7] riscv: dts: bouffalolab: add the bl808 SoC base device tree

Icenowy Zheng
2022-11-20T11:59:17Z

在 2022-11-20星期日的 11:02 +0000，Conor Dooley写道：
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 04:21:12PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Add a baisc dtsi for the bouffalolab bl808 SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile               |  1 +
> >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/bouffalolab/bl808.dtsi | 74
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/bouffalolab/bl808.dtsi
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > index ff174996cdfd..b525467152b2 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +subdir-y += bouffalolab
> >  subdir-y += sifive
> >  subdir-y += starfive
> >  subdir-$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN_K210_DTB_BUILTIN) += canaan
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/bouffalolab/bl808.dtsi
> > b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/bouffalolab/bl808.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c98ebb14ee10
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/bouffalolab/bl808.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > +       compatible = "bouffalolab,bl808";
> > +       #address-cells = <1>;
> > +       #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +       cpus {
> > +               timebase-frequency = <1000000>;
> > +               #address-cells = <1>;
> > +               #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +               cpu0: cpu@0 {
> > +                       compatible = "thead,c906", "riscv";
>
> So this is not yet defined as the dt etc for the d1 has not yet
> landed.
> I think I will go pick up that patch for v6.2 as it should make
> everyone's life easier.
>
> Without that, dtbs_check produces:
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/bouffalolab/bl808-sipeed-m1s.dtb:0:0:
> /cpus/cpu@0: failed to match any schema with compatible:
> ['thead,c906', 'riscv']
>
> > +                       device_type = "cpu";
> > +                       reg = <0>;
> > +                       d-cache-block-size = <64>;
> > +                       d-cache-sets = <256>;
> > +                       d-cache-size = <32768>;
> > +                       i-cache-block-size = <64>;
> > +                       i-cache-sets = <128>;
> > +                       i-cache-size = <32768>;
> > +                       mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
> > +                       riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> > +
> > +                       cpu0_intc: interrupt-controller {
> > +                               compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> > +                               interrupt-controller;
> > +                               #address-cells = <0>;
> > +                               #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +                       };
> > +               };
> > +       };
> > +
> > +       xtal: xtal-clk {
> > +               compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > +               clock-frequency = <40000000>;
> > +               clock-output-names = "xtal";
> > +               #clock-cells = <0>;
> > +       };
> > +
> > +       soc {
> > +               compatible = "simple-bus";
> > +               ranges;
> > +               interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> > +               dma-noncoherent;
> > +               #address-cells = <1>;
> > +               #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +               uart0: serial@30002000 {
> > +                       compatible = "bouffalolab,uart";
> > +                       reg = <0x30002000 0x1000>;
> > +                       interrupts = <20 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +                       clocks = <&xtal>;
> > +                       status = "disabled";
> > +               };
> > +
> > +               plic: interrupt-controller@e0000000 {
> > +                       compatible = "thead,c900-plic";
>
> Hmm, this one fails validation too. Likely you need to add a
> "bouffalolab,plic" to the plic dt-binding or otherwise modify the
> binding such that thead,c900-plic on it's own is permitted. CC Samuel
> on
> that patch please in case he has an opinion on it.

Personally I prefer a single c900-plic in compatible, because the PLIC
doesn't look so configurable in C906/C910 (the interrupt source number
is really adjustable, but it's already in the riscv,ndev property).

>
> Also, I've taken over picking up the misc dt stuff that Palmer used
> to
> apply - so canaan, starfive & sifive stuff. Do you intended sending
> PRs
> to Arnd for this stuff, or would you like to me bundle it with what I
> am
> going to be sending anyway?
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
> > +                       reg = <0xe0000000 0x4000000>;
> > +                       interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc
> > 0xffffffff>,
> > +                                             <&cpu0_intc 9>;
> > +                       interrupt-controller;
> > +                       #address-cells = <0>;
> > +                       #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > +                       riscv,ndev = <64>;
> > +               };
> > +       };
> > +};
> > --
> > 2.37.2
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv